We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The stability of the solution is OK."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."
"It is not performing well."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
Earn 20 points
Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 23rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.