BMC AMI DevX vs Magic xpi Integration Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared BMC and Magic Software solutions aren't in the same category. BMC is ranked #4 in TDM , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 12.2% mindshare in the category. Magic Software is ranked #33 in PaaS , and holds a 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

8,760 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Read 1 Magic xpi Integration Platform review

1,336 Views
681 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC AMI DevX and Magic xpi Integration Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Informatica, Broadcom and others in Test Data Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Data Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (4th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (29th)

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Average Rating

3.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

BMC AMI DevX and Magic xpi Integration Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. BMC AMI DevX is designed for Test Data Management and holds a mindshare of 12.2%, up 5.8% compared to last year.
Magic xpi Integration Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 1.1% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.

Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	12.2%
Perforce Delphix	16.6%
Broadcom Test Data Manager	13.5%
Other	57.7%

Test Data Management

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Magic xpi Integration Platform	1.1%
Boomi iPaaS	6.8%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	6.5%
Other	85.6%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

it_user977634

Enterprise IT Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A low-performing integration tool

We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"For bank applications, DB2 is the best on the market."

"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."

"It does our CICS NEWCOPYs and our Db2 binds for us, whereas before, that was a manual process. It takes a lot of the workload off of the operations folks and off the DBAs."

"ISPW is an excellent product; it does everything the developers need it to do, we were able to build it and customize it very simply as we became more familiar with how the system works during installation, and it doesn't need a lot of care and feeding once it's up and running."

"I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management."

"BMC AMI DevX tools have noticeably impacted our developers' productivity and efficiency."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The stability of the solution is OK."

Cons

"I find it more cumbersome to use Topaz."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"BMC AMI DevX is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve, such as simplifying the initial installation and configuration, especially for first-time users."

"We have noticed that Topaz supported Eclipse environments are rather old. It would be nice if Topaz were compatible with the more current Eclipse releases."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"It's a very complicated tool."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time."

"It is not performing well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The price point is great."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

26%

Printing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	20

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

My understanding is that BMC AMI DevX is an enterprise product with custom licensing, so pricing is typically negotiated based on factors such as the modules purchased, organization size, and usage...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve, such as simplifying the initial installation and configuration, especially for first-time users. It could also i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

My main use case for BMC AMI DevX is to work with COBOL and JCL development on IBM. I mainly use it for editing, browsing data sets, submitting jobs, and debugging applications. I appreciate the Ec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 15% of the time

TIBCO Spotfire vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Rocket LegaSuite vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Magic xpi Integration Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

September 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

September 2026

Download Magic xpi Integration Platform product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

Magic xpi Integration Platform provides seamless connectivity and automation for businesses seeking efficient integration of their software applications across diverse systems.

Magic xpi offers a robust environment for developing integration projects with its code-free approach. It supports a wide array of connectivity options and enhances efficiency by automating business processes. By leveraging its versatility, it connects cloud services with on-premise systems, thus enabling comprehensive integration capabilities.

What are the most important features of Magic xpi Integration Platform?

Code-free Integration: Simplifies complex integrations with a visual drag-and-drop interface.
Comprehensive Connectivity: Ensures broad connectivity options for various systems and platforms.
Business Process Automation: Streamlines workflows by automating routine tasks.
Robust Security: Incorporates measures to protect data across integrated systems.
Scalability: Offers a scalable solution to accommodate growing business requirements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Users report improved operational efficiency with streamlined integration.
Cost-effectiveness: Lowers long-term costs through automation and reduced manual intervention.
Flexibility: Adapts to specific business needs with customizable options and integrations.
Support and Reliability: Offers strong vendor support and reliable performance according to users.

Magic xpi is implemented widely in industries such as manufacturing, retail, and healthcare. It enables manufacturers to optimize supply chains, retailers to synchronize online and offline operations, and healthcare providers to integrate patient management systems. Its industry-specific adaptations make it an ideal choice for addressing targeted business challenges.

Magic Software

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Godrej Properties

Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Informatica, Broadcom and others in Test Data Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.