"A lot of the issues in Forescout are mitigated in Aruba ClearPass, it supports all the expected protocols."
"We are mainly using Aruba ClearPass for our clients for securing access to their on-premise assets. As per customer expectations, we are trying our best to track the complete user activity in the network. This is the main and the core feature we require."
"Stable with good QBT technology."
"Aruba ClearPass is a simple solution for customers to see what is happening on their network."
"The visibility and security features are most valuable. We get a clear view. It is a very secure product for educational institutions."
"The interface is very easy to use and the workflow is quite straightforward."
"Aruba ClearPass's most valuable features are simple accessing, operating, and management. Additionally, the dashboard and performance work well."
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"The monitoring of Aruba ClearPass needs improvement. For example, they have monitoring for TECHx and you can find out what the administrator did. However, if Aruba ClearPass is managing GUI devices, you do not know what the administrator is doing."
"ClearPass' interface could be more user-friendly."
"The improvement can be in the cloud area. They can improve it for the cloud so that we can deploy it on the cloud."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky."
"The technical support has some room for improvement. It takes them a long time to respond sometimes. I rate Aruba support six out of 10."
"The GUI of Aruba ClearPass could improve, it is not user-friendly."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"The licensing model could be improved."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 15 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 6th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 1 review. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.4, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "Communicates well with third-party products, offers good security, and has helpful technical support". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Portnox CORE, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Fortinet FortiNAC, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
