We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"It effectively addresses issues arising from endpoint connections to the network, contributing to an enhanced overall security solution for our clients."
"There are some features that are working well."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The device fingerprinting feature allowed for easy creation and enforcement of access policies."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is having visibility over the IoT devices on the network."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's documentation should be improved because there's not much debugging or troubleshooting documentation for the Fortinet FortiNAC."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"The reporting capability needs to be improved."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"The response and resolution time for technical support issues need to be improved."
"The solution's licensing price should be improved."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Sophos Network Access Control, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.