Logz.io vs NetWitness Platform comparison

Logz.io and NetWitness are both solutions in the Log Management category. Logz.io is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0, while NetWitness is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.3. Logz.io holds a 0.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to NetWitness’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Logz.io

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

1,218 Views
962 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetWitness Platform

Read 36 NetWitness Platform reviews

1,776 Views
852 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Logz.io

NetWitness Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

NetWitness Platform and Logz.io are two prominent solutions in the cybersecurity and log analysis space. Users are happier with the advanced features and comprehensive support provided by NetWitness Platform. However, Logz.io excels in its ease of use and integration capabilities, giving it a competitive edge.

Features: NetWitness Platform users value its robust threat detection, comprehensive analytics, and advanced threat intelligence. Logz.io users appreciate its integration with open-source tools, real-time monitoring, and scalability features.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness Platform users highlight challenges with complexity, a steep learning curve, and the need for a more intuitive interface. Logz.io users point out the need for better documentation, enhanced scalability, and improved user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness Platform users find deployment complex and time-consuming, but they praise the customer service. Logz.io users report a smoother deployment process with good customer service.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness Platform is perceived as expensive, but users feel the ROI justifies the cost. Logz.io offers competitive pricing and users feel it provides good ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io

Ranking in Log Management

36th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

47th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetWitness Platform

Ranking in Log Management

34th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

30th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NetWitness Platform	0.5%
Logz.io	0.7%
Other	98.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

MOTASHIM Al Razi

CISO at One Bank Limited

It is a stable solution, but they should make the user interface easier to understand

The solution's initial setup takes work. We have to organize multiple paths and many features. The deployment process takes less than a week. But it takes a month to complete if we want to make the solution smarter by integrating it with various devices. I rate the process as a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult."

"The most valuable features are its ingestion of logs and raising of alerts based on those logs."

"It gives the capability for the incident response team to correlate logs to identify any kind of problem like malware and incidents in a general sense, both for logs and packets."

"The most valuable features are the packet decoder, log decoder, and concentrator."

"The newer 11.5 version that my team is using has found it to have good mapping."

"It's fully scalable. There is no limit. Of course, the license limits per day the number of terabytes. In my opinion, it's very flexible."

"The most valuable feature is the hunting ability to work in a CERT."

"I can have enterprise security, email security, next generation firewall security log, HIDS and NIDS logs, etc. all on the same dashboard. It makes it easy to pinpoint or correlate our server to this. I can find out if there is lateral movement. This is the biggest advantage of this solution."

More NetWitness Platform pros

Cons

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"The system looks like it is a mix of a bunch of different systems, and nothing looked like it was quite together."

"The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement."

"The solution should have more integration capabilities with different platforms."

"I believe that integrating the solution with other products such as Oracle would be beneficial."

"The threat detection capability and centralizing and upgrading capability need to be improved. The threat alert capability needs to be improved as well because there is some lag time at present. They need to work on their database search too."

"The documentation is not as structured as I would like, personally, and I think that it can be improved and made much more user-friendly."

"Health monitoring of the event sources and devices."

"More customizability is required, which is something that they need to improve on."

More NetWitness Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"The tool is an open source product."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product is a little expensive."

"Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."

"There is a licensing fee and the customer can choose whether he wishes this to be subscription-based or perpetual."

"RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets do not have a subscription model, it's a one-time purchase. There is only a perpetual license."

"Compared to the competition, the is price is not that high."

"The product is expensive."

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap."

"The new pricing and licensing mechanisms are fair. I would advise always to get the full solution (i.e., not only Logs)."

More NetWitness Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetWitness Platform?

The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetWitness Platform?

The pricing is comparable to others, and I consider the cost to be intermediate. Specific cost details are unknown to me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetWitness Platform?

There is currently no need for improvement in the SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ), though there could be potential enhancements by integrating with AI.

See all answers

Comparisons

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 22% of the time

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs Logz.io

Compared 7% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 8% of the time

RSA enVision vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More NetWitness Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io

December 2025

Download Logz.io product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform

December 2025

Download NetWitness Platform product report

Also Known As

Logz

RSA Security Analytics

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Logz.io

NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

Los Angeles World Airports, Reply

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logz.io vs. NetWitness Platform report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.