We performed a comparison between Loadbalancer.org and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques."
"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."
"For now, it's stable."
"The support we have received from Loadbalancer.org has been good."
"Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix."
"The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall."
"Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency."
"The performance is good."
"The solution has been very stable."
"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
"I found the link load balancer and server load balancer are the most valuable."
"The most valuable features of Radware Alteon are the reverse proxy functionality and the SSL offload and hardware."
"The link load balancing is a great feature."
"The GUI was a valuable feature. It was uncomplicated and easy to use."
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"The command line interface is simple and very user-friendly."
"I would like it if Loadbalancer had the ability to make rules for specific shared bots."
"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"I'd like to see scalability improved; it can be costly."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"The solution can be a bit pricey."
"The interface from Loadbalancer.org should be improved."
"Loadbalancer.org's complexity could be reduced."
"I would like this solution to have an integration tool that will convert configuration from other software, into readable values for this product during implementation."
"We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"The service could be improved by better customer support."
"The community portal does not have a place to find scripts."
"We recently had a problem with the tables Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates."
"Radware Alteon could improve the troubleshooting from the command line interface, they could do a better job making it easier."
"Performance could be improved."
Loadbalancer.org is ranked 9th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 8 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 8th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 9 reviews. Loadbalancer.org is rated 8.0, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "Great load-balancing services and multiple backend servers, but it would be great if it had script-sharing features in a community hub". Loadbalancer.org is most compared with HAProxy, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Radware LinkProof, Citrix NetScaler and HAProxy. See our Loadbalancer.org vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
