Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs LoadBalancer Enterprise comparison

A10 Networks and Loadbalancer.org are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. A10 Networks is ranked #18, while Loadbalancer.org is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. A10 Networks holds a 0.7% mindshare in ADC, compared to Loadbalancer.org’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Loadbalancer.org users who would recommend it.
A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Read 3 A10 Networks Lightning ADC reviews
  • 227 Views
  • 220 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
LoadBalancer Enterprise
Read 23 LoadBalancer Enterprise reviews
  • 1,127 Views
  • 1,116 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

A10 Networks Lightning ADC and LoadBalancer Enterprise compete in the application delivery and load balancing market. A10 Networks Lightning ADC may have an edge due to better pricing and responsive support, while LoadBalancer Enterprise excels in features.

Features: A10 Networks Lightning ADC includes performance optimization, strong threat protection, and scalability. LoadBalancer Enterprise focuses on flexibility, advanced load balancing capabilities, and customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Networks Lightning ADC offers a straightforward deployment process supported by comprehensive documentation. LoadBalancer Enterprise is known for its intuitive setup and personalized customer support during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Networks Lightning ADC provides a more competitive pricing model with lower initial costs, offering a consistent return on investment. LoadBalancer Enterprise has a higher initial cost but offers long-term savings through advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
18th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LoadBalancer Enterprise
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Lightning ADC is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LoadBalancer Enterprise is 4.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
LoadBalancer Enterprise4.3%
A10 Networks Lightning ADC0.7%
Other95.0%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

RONALDO DE MELO - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient application security while optimizing connections
The initial setup is simple; it is not complex. The configuration itself is simple and can be done in a couple of hours. However, the migration of the system to A10 Networks takes longer due to critical applications. Clients prefer to move them one by one, which is why it takes a significant amount of time. The configuration itself is simple, especially for this application.
Read full review
Roger Seelaender - PeerSpot reviewer
Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised
The solution can be improved with the development of a SIP engine because it is difficult to manage SBCs. All SBCs are really tough to write rules for. If we could put this in front of an SBC to have the right rules to possibly block the traffic, that would be very helpful. The solution can also improve the relationship between Loadbalancer.org and Metaswitch, or now, Microsoft because Metaswitch was purchased by Microsoft. They both position themselves as certified but don't always talk to each other. I wish there would be closer integration between the solution and the vendors when either release new upgrades to their product line. Often we find issues on either end post upgrades.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like about Lightning ADC, is that instead of having a big appliance sitting in front of the Kubernetes cluster, Lightning can pretty much go inside of Kubernetes."
"It allows you to secure the application while balancing the connections for many other customers, reducing CPU usage and server load."
"Our clients appreciate that this is a security enabled solution."
"Load balancing helps us distribute both incoming and outgoing data loads evenly among the servers, preventing overload on a single server."
"It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques."
"The SSL Layer 7 load balancing is valuable."
"The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall."
"Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency."
"We can more easily set up a test environment, because you can easily configure your forms. It makes it more flexible for us, to convert our test environment to a production environment, without having to change DNSs on the outside. You just configure the forms on the inside. So without changing the actual endpoint for the end user, we can create completely different networks in the background."
"It does what it’s supposed to do which is balancing an important intranet site we are using, so if one server dies, the second becomes active straight away."
"For now, it's stable."
More LoadBalancer Enterprise pros
 

Cons

"The support from A10 should be improved."
"We would like to see some improvement in the rapidity with which we can customize security facts within the solution."
"A10 documentation is not as open and accessible as AWS and Azure documentation is."
"I would like it if Loadbalancer had the ability to make rules for specific shared bots."
"Possibly a more graphical overview page (with colors) to give a two second overview to see if everything is working fine."
"Originally we had some stability issues with it, so they replaced it with a new box and it's fine."
"There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas."
"If I have to say something, I suppose they could add an automated configuration backup to an FTP location (or something similar) so you don’t have to manually do it. I don’t see this as a problem, of course, as the configuration rarely changes and we only need one backup, but maybe for other users that feature would be handy."
"An area for improvement in Loadbalancer.org is that sometimes it works fine, but sometimes, it has issues. The setup for Loadbalancer.org is also complex, so that's another area for improvement."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"It would be great if there was a way to gain access to the graphing data, to create custom reports. If we had a way to use the graphing data, we could use it to present certain information to our client, such as the uptime status for their service."
More LoadBalancer Enterprise cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It filled a requirement for our project, and it did so at lesser cost than their competitors.​"
"The costs associated with Loadbalancer.org depends on the technology. For some, we need to pay, but others are open, so they're free."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"I’m not entirely sure about the rating since I'm not very technical. I haven't thoroughly compared the ratings. So, if you're asking for my impression so far, I would rate it around five out of 10."
"The solution requires an annual support license of $2,780 for four systems or $695 a year per unit for support not including the units."
"I think it’s very affordable."
"It's worth the cost. It's not cheap, but it's a good solution. If you're looking for a good solution, this is a good solution. Is it cheap? No. Is it worth the money? Yes, I think it is."
"These guys make their pricing scheme really easy.​"
More LoadBalancer Enterprise pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
12%
University
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Do you recommend Loadbalancer.org?
Since Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, I would recommend this solution for smaller businesses that don’t have major scaling requirements and don’t have the budget for a commercial solut...
See all answers
What do you like most about Loadbalancer.org?
Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Loadbalancer.org?
Pricing of Loadbalancer.org is something to consider.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NetScaler vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC Logo
NetScaler vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Compared 38% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Compared 28% of the time
More A10 Networks Lightning ADC Competitors
NetScaler vs LoadBalancer Enterprise Logo
NetScaler vs LoadBalancer Enterprise
Compared 21% of the time
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs LoadBalancer Enterprise Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs LoadBalancer Enterprise
Compared 16% of the time
HAProxy vs LoadBalancer Enterprise Logo
HAProxy vs LoadBalancer Enterprise
Compared 16% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs LoadBalancer Enterprise Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs LoadBalancer Enterprise
Compared 14% of the time
More LoadBalancer Enterprise Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
August 2025
A10 Networks Lightning ADC reportDownload A10 Networks Lightning ADC product report
Buyer's Guide
LoadBalancer Enterprise
September 2025
LoadBalancer Enterprise reportDownload LoadBalancer Enterprise product report
 

Also Known As

Lightning ADS
No data available
 

Overview

A cloud-native, software-defined solution that provides integrated advanced load-balancing, performance optimization, application security and per-application analytics to increase operational agility and application performance.

A10 Networks

LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.

LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.

What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?
  • Ease of Use: Accessible interface for team members with basic network knowledge.
  • Reliability and High Availability: Ensures consistent service with effective load distribution.
  • SSL Termination with SNI: Supports secure connections with Server Name Indication.
  • Layer 7 Load Balancing: Enhanced functionality for better traffic management.
  • Scalability and Performance: Offers strong performance with low latency.
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
  • Quick Remote Support: Fast assistance for issue resolution.
  • Low Complexity: Streamlined operations compared to competitors.
  • Traffic Routing and Monitoring: Efficient management aids in decision-making.
  • Flexibility in Deployment: Suitable for diverse traffic scenarios and server needs.

LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.

Loadbalancer.org
 

Sample Customers

Handle Financial
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Buyer's Guide
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise
September 2025
Free Report: A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise
Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.