A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs LoadBalancer Enterprise comparison

A10 Networks and Loadbalancer.org are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. A10 Networks is ranked #17, while Loadbalancer.org is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5. A10 Networks holds a 0.5% mindshare in ADC, compared to Loadbalancer.org’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Loadbalancer.org users who would recommend it.

A10 Networks Lightning ADC

Read 3 A10 Networks Lightning ADC reviews

196 Views
190 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LoadBalancer Enterprise

Read 23 LoadBalancer Enterprise reviews

1,112 Views
1,101 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

A10 Networks Lightning ADC

LoadBalancer Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

A10 Networks Lightning ADC and LoadBalancer Enterprise compete in the application delivery and load balancing market. A10 Networks Lightning ADC may have an edge due to better pricing and responsive support, while LoadBalancer Enterprise excels in features.

Features: A10 Networks Lightning ADC includes performance optimization, strong threat protection, and scalability. LoadBalancer Enterprise focuses on flexibility, advanced load balancing capabilities, and customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Networks Lightning ADC offers a straightforward deployment process supported by comprehensive documentation. LoadBalancer Enterprise is known for its intuitive setup and personalized customer support during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Networks Lightning ADC provides a more competitive pricing model with lower initial costs, offering a consistent return on investment. LoadBalancer Enterprise has a higher initial cost but offers long-term savings through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,776 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Lightning ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

17th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LoadBalancer Enterprise

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Lightning ADC is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LoadBalancer Enterprise is 3.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

RONALDO DE MELO

Sales Account Executive at l8

Efficient application security while optimizing connections

The initial setup is simple; it is not complex. The configuration itself is simple and can be done in a couple of hours. However, the migration of the system to A10 Networks takes longer due to critical applications. Clients prefer to move them one by one, which is why it takes a significant amount of time. The configuration itself is simple, especially for this application.

Read full review

Roger Seelaender

UCaaS Engineering Manager at EarthLink

Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised

The solution can be improved with the development of a SIP engine because it is difficult to manage SBCs. All SBCs are really tough to write rules for. If we could put this in front of an SBC to have the right rules to possibly block the traffic, that would be very helpful. The solution can also improve the relationship between Loadbalancer.org and Metaswitch, or now, Microsoft because Metaswitch was purchased by Microsoft. They both position themselves as certified but don't always talk to each other. I wish there would be closer integration between the solution and the vendors when either release new upgrades to their product line. Often we find issues on either end post upgrades.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our clients appreciate that this is a security enabled solution."

"It allows you to secure the application while balancing the connections for many other customers, reducing CPU usage and server load."

"What I like about Lightning ADC, is that instead of having a big appliance sitting in front of the Kubernetes cluster, Lightning can pretty much go inside of Kubernetes."

"Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed."

"The load balancers have an easy installation and a relatively simple, easy user interface to use."

"Most important for us that it makes sure that the load is distributed and that we always have access to the end servers."

"The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall."

"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."

"The user interface precludes need to be well versed with Linux IPVS command line. This make it easy for junior team members to participate in managing load balancing needs."

"The SSL Layer 7 load balancing is valuable."

"The support we have received from Loadbalancer.org has been good."

More LoadBalancer Enterprise pros

Cons

"The support from A10 should be improved."

"We would like to see some improvement in the rapidity with which we can customize security facts within the solution."

"A10 documentation is not as open and accessible as AWS and Azure documentation is."

"Originally we had some stability issues with it, so they replaced it with a new box and it's fine."

"An area for improvement in Loadbalancer.org is that sometimes it works fine, but sometimes, it has issues. The setup for Loadbalancer.org is also complex, so that's another area for improvement."

"The interface from Loadbalancer.org should be improved."

"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."

"Compared to the physical products, the solution's throughput is a little less."

"It would be great if there was a way to gain access to the graphing data, to create custom reports. If we had a way to use the graphing data, we could use it to present certain information to our client, such as the uptime status for their service."

"If I have to say something, I suppose they could add an automated configuration backup to an FTP location (or something similar) so you don’t have to manually do it. I don’t see this as a problem, of course, as the configuration rarely changes and we only need one backup, but maybe for other users that feature would be handy."

"I would like it if Loadbalancer had the ability to make rules for specific shared bots."

More LoadBalancer Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Licensing fees are paid annually."

"These guys make their pricing scheme really easy."

"It is inexpensive, and even their “unlimited” version, the VA MAX is still far cheaper than competitors."

"They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%."

"It's worth the cost. It's not cheap, but it's a good solution. If you're looking for a good solution, this is a good solution. Is it cheap? No. Is it worth the money? Yes, I think it is."

"The costs associated with Loadbalancer.org depends on the technology. For some, we need to pay, but others are open, so they're free."

"It was easy to upgrade the license for unlimited clusters and servers. Pricing is fair."

"It filled a requirement for our project, and it did so at lesser cost than their competitors."

More LoadBalancer Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Loadbalancer.org?

Since Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, I would recommend this solution for smaller businesses that don’t have major scaling requirements and don’t have the budget for a commercial solut...

See all answers

What do you like most about Loadbalancer.org?

Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Loadbalancer.org?

Pricing of Loadbalancer.org is something to consider.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC

Compared 56% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Lightning ADC

Compared 44% of the time

More A10 Networks Lightning ADC Competitors

NetScaler vs LoadBalancer Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

HAProxy vs LoadBalancer Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs LoadBalancer Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs LoadBalancer Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs LoadBalancer Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

More LoadBalancer Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

July 2025

Download A10 Networks Lightning ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

LoadBalancer Enterprise

July 2025

Download LoadBalancer Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Lightning ADS

No data available

Overview

A cloud-native, software-defined solution that provides integrated advanced load-balancing, performance optimization, application security and per-application analytics to increase operational agility and application performance.

A10 Networks

LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.

LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.

What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?

Ease of Use: Accessible interface for team members with basic network knowledge.
Reliability and High Availability: Ensures consistent service with effective load distribution.
SSL Termination with SNI: Supports secure connections with Server Name Indication.
Layer 7 Load Balancing: Enhanced functionality for better traffic management.
Scalability and Performance: Offers strong performance with low latency.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Quick Remote Support: Fast assistance for issue resolution.
Low Complexity: Streamlined operations compared to competitors.
Traffic Routing and Monitoring: Efficient management aids in decision-making.
Flexibility in Deployment: Suitable for diverse traffic scenarios and server needs.

LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.

Loadbalancer.org

Sample Customers

Handle Financial

Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise

July 2025

Free Report: A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. LoadBalancer Enterprise report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.