Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Pipedream comparison

Kong and Pipedream are both solutions in the API Management category. Kong is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Pipedream is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0. Kong holds a 7.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to Pipedream’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kong users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pipedream users who would recommend it.

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 25 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,788 Views
5,704 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Pipedream

Read 4 Pipedream reviews

174 Views
43 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Pipedream

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kong Gateway Enterprise and Pipedream compete in the API management and integration space. Kong Gateway Enterprise has an edge in enterprise-grade security and scalability, while Pipedream is strong in integration capabilities.

Features: Kong Gateway Enterprise provides dynamic routing, rate limiting, and advanced security functions, appealing to businesses prioritizing control and protection. It ensures robust API management for large-scale operations. Pipedream offers significant integration capabilities across multiple platforms, simplifying complex workflows and enhancing its no-code platform for fast, versatile connectivity.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Kong Gateway Enterprise facilitates a smooth deployment process with extensive documentation and a strong support network, ideal for large-scale implementations. Pipedream reduces deployment complexity with its no-code platform, shortening integration times and reducing technical overhead, though immediate support may be less comprehensive compared to Kong.

Pricing and ROI: Kong Gateway Enterprise involves higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features but offers long-term returns with its scalability and security. Pipedream provides a cost-effective solution with a lower entry barrier, potentially delivering quicker ROI through efficient integration processes, suited for agile operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pipedream

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 7.0%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pipedream is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ASHOK YADAV

Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions but lacks software upgrades

Upgrading Kong Gateway Enterprise should be more sophisticated and innovative. The main issue is with the update process. Our DevOps and admin teams need to update multiple files, which is cumbersome. For instance, in cases where Palantir countries are involved, they have to update many files, which is not ideal. However, for other tasks like configuring the message routing and services and handling all the configurations, the process is acceptable. The software version upgrade process should be improved. Additionally, the DevOps portal should be integrated more natively. There are a few other areas for improvement, such as implementing automatic load balancing. The status of the office team, whether it is up or down, should be checked at the API gateway level to facilitate load balancing.

Read full review

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use

The UI and the fact that the product is not easy to use are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required. Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself. Pipedream is easy to use for someone with tech skills or someone new who is trying to learn how to code. Though it is user-friendly for people with tech skills, it is not at all user-friendly for people who do not have any tech skills. The user interface of Pipedream is very simple compared to the user interfaces of some other products like monday.com or Asana. Asana and monday.com have visually appealing user interfaces. The user interface of Pipedream is not visually appealing at all. The aforementioned details need to be considered for improvement in the solution. I just wish there was a little bit more documentation on how everything worked when it came to deployment since I was a fairly new employee at the company at that time. Sometimes, the workflow wouldn't work fine in Pipedream, and I had to check it myself for errors. Finding the errors in Pipedream is hard to find. I think it would be good if Pipedream had the ability to send an email to notify you that there is an error with the code instead of having to go back in and then look every day or every hour if there was an error in the code.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features I like include ease of operation and implementation in a cloud environment, the dashboarding features for API statistics, and the user-friendly developer portal."

"It offers a wide range of plugins that we leverage, including OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions, and more."

"I like everything about it. It provides the security we need."

"Kong Enterprise comes with some ready plug-ins, which is very good for the customers."

"Based on my experience, I would definitely recommend Kong Gateway Enterprise to other people."

"The most valuable features of Kong Enterprise are the out-of-the-box open source easy functionality."

"The route limiting feature is very valuable."

"The solution's technical support is good and fast in terms of responsiveness and problem-solving skills."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."

"The solution enables users to integrate several things."

"The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."

Cons

"The tool needs to improve in areas like documentation and UI."

"More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions."

"Understanding the configurations and knowing what needs to be done can be a bit difficult initially."

"The OS upgrades are not as frequent as they should be and they are bulky."

"We are facing issues with the solution's features like reports and traffic analysis."

"The developer portal needs to be improved."

"We would like to see an automatic data API when we have a table in the database."

"The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

"They should give more information about trigger failure."

"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."

"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."

"We faced some server timeouts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

"The licensing fees are paid yearly."

"The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"It's expensive in Thailand (10 million baht, in Thai currency)."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."

"The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?

The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pipedream?

It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pipedream?

The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pipedream?

They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.

See all answers

Comparisons

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

June 2025

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

May 2025

Download Pipedream product report

Overview

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong

Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

Pipedream

Sample Customers

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream

June 2025

Free Report: Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream

Find out what your peers are saying about Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Pipedream report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.