KiSSFLOW vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

KiSSFLOW and SAS are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. KiSSFLOW is ranked #24, while SAS is ranked #18. KiSSFLOW holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAS’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of KiSSFLOW users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 20% of SAS users who would recommend it.

KiSSFLOW

Read 12 KiSSFLOW reviews

2,028 Views
385 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAS Activity-Based Management

Read 5 SAS Activity-Based Management reviews

591 Views
591 Comparison Views

20% willing to recommend

KiSSFLOW

SAS Activity-Based Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Activity-Based Management and KiSSFLOW are prominent contenders in the business process management category. KiSSFLOW takes the lead with its extensive feature set and adaptability, while SAS Activity-Based Management shows strengths in support and pricing.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management excels in activity-based costing, advanced analytics, and precise resource allocation. It provides extensive financial insights for cost management. KiSSFLOW provides robust workflow automation, seamless platform integrations, and user-friendly process designs, supporting operational agility.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management may enhance its interface to be more intuitive, streamline deployment complexities, and expand integration capabilities. KiSSFLOW could benefit from more detailed analytics, expanded customer support options, and enhanced reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management involves a complex deployment due to its intricate functionalities but comes with dependable customer service. KiSSFLOW offers a cloud-based deployment ensuring simplicity and accessibility, with efficient setup facilitating a supportive user experience.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management features higher initial setup costs but delivers long-term financial insights through its comprehensive cost structure. KiSSFLOW provides a favorable ROI with lower upfront costs, expeditious deployment, and efficient process automation suitable for organizations with budget constraints seeking quick returns.

To learn more, read our detailed KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KiSSFLOW

Ranking in Business Performance Management

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th)

SAS Activity-Based Management

Ranking in Business Performance Management

18th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 2.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Activity-Based Management is 2.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAS Activity-Based Management	2.5%
KiSSFLOW	2.0%
Other	95.5%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Julius Jagdon

Business Tools at Motorola Solutions

The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver

When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Read full review

it_user530763

CEO at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees

Helps to compare production costs across different departments. Try CostPerform from QPR.

Helps to compare production costs across different departments The data integration is very complex Visualization of the cost flow is not user-friendly It takes hours to build OLAP cubes to analyze the results of the model We have been using this solution for three years. I would rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."

"My advice to anybody who is considering KiSSFLOW is that it is easy to use and I recommend it."

"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."

"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."

"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."

"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."

"The user interface is very, very good."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

More KiSSFLOW pros

"We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improved the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred due to the traceability feature."

"Helps to compare production costs across different departments."

"The product helped determine the organization's true cost of providing its products and services to customers."

"The product allows us to calculate the distributed cost across activities."

"Cube generation is a valuable feature."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."

"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."

"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."

"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."

"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."

"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."

"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."

"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."

More KiSSFLOW cons

"The interface is poorly designed and could really use an improvement to compete with other comparable software."

"The data integration is very complex Visualization of the cost flow is not user-friendly It takes hours to build OLAP cubes to analyze the results of the model"

"The usability needs to be improved but bear in mind that we did not have the latest update."

"It could be made much more simpler. Most of the time it looks like a black box for developers."

"We experienced severe performance issues when the models created are getting more details and becoming more complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."

"The license is very expensive."

"The product costs $15 per user per month."

"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."

"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Comparisons

Camunda vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 6% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 4% of the time

Unqork vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 3% of the time

More KiSSFLOW Competitors

Oracle HFM vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 9% of the time

NICE Merced vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 8% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 7% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 7% of the time

More SAS Activity-Based Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW

March 2026

Download KiSSFLOW product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

March 2026

Download SAS Activity-Based Management product report

Overview

KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.

KiSSFLOW

SAS Activity-Based Management is an analytic application that models business processes to determine cost, profitability and drivers. With this solution, organizations can make informed decisions that streamline processes, deliver revenue growth and reduce costs across the organization.

SAS

Sample Customers

KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.

Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

March 2026

Free Report: KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

Find out what your peers are saying about KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KiSSFLOW vs. SAS Activity-Based Management report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.