CCH Tagetik vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

SAS Activity-Based Management and CCH Tagetik compete in the financial management software domain. Based on feature analysis, CCH Tagetik has the upper hand due to its more comprehensive offerings.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management offers OLAP drilling with charts and graphs, specific to version 6.2, detailed financial analytics, and advanced cost modeling. CCH Tagetik provides versatile budgeting and planning tools, seamless integration with various applications, and a robust, scalable single database solution.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management could enhance functionality by reintroducing features like OLAP drilling in newer versions and expanding integration capabilities with third-party apps. Additionally, improving user interface design for broader accessibility would be beneficial. CCH Tagetik can refine its workflow features to avoid excessive complexity and provide clearer guidance. It should also focus on simplifying deployment processes and offer more flexible pricing structures to accommodate diverse client needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management's deployment is straightforward, making it a suitable option for organizations focused on strategic financial tools, and it maintains responsive customer service. CCH Tagetik, while having a more complex setup due to its extensive features, also supports a strong customer service team to assist with deployment and user training.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management is competitively priced, leading to quicker ROI based on its focused features. CCH Tagetik, with higher initial setup costs, offers greater long-term value through its comprehensive financial management features, justifying the higher price for businesses seeking extensive financial capabilities.