Oracle Hyperion vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

Oracle and SAS are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6, while SAS is ranked #18. Oracle holds a 4.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAS’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 20% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,310 Views
2,284 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SAS Activity-Based Management

Read 5 SAS Activity-Based Management reviews

591 Views
591 Comparison Views

20% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

SAS Activity-Based Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Activity-Based Management and Oracle Hyperion compete in financial analysis and planning. Oracle Hyperion has a competitive edge due to its robust feature set, despite SAS's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management is known for detailed cost tracking, process-based optimization, and activity-based costing to efficiently analyze resource allocation. Oracle Hyperion provides advanced financial consolidation, rich data integration, and an integrated approach to broader financial processes.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management could improve in scalability, reporting features, and data visualization. Oracle Hyperion could enhance ease of use, streamline training requirements, and reduce implementation complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management offers swift implementation and integrates easily into existing workflows, with strong customer service support. Oracle Hyperion's deployment is more complex but is supported by extensive documentation and a broad support network.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management presents lower setup costs and offers significant ROI through its affordability and precision in cost analysis. Oracle Hyperion, despite its higher initial costs, provides substantial ROI with its comprehensive features in financial management.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Activity-Based Management

Ranking in Business Performance Management

18th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 4.7%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Activity-Based Management is 2.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Hyperion	4.7%
SAS Activity-Based Management	2.5%
Other	92.8%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features

The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.

Read full review

it_user530763

CEO at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees

Helps to compare production costs across different departments. Try CostPerform from QPR.

Helps to compare production costs across different departments The data integration is very complex Visualization of the cost flow is not user-friendly It takes hours to build OLAP cubes to analyze the results of the model We have been using this solution for three years. I would rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."

"The most valuable features are those associated with modules and SP, IT in this space, planning, HFM, and PME."

"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."

"Oracle has an integrated solution for Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) and Hyperion. It keeps the two platforms opened up to each other."

"This is a customizable product. Our implementation was designed to fit our needs."

"One can see that it's a mature product because it addresses all the requirements that you must need for financial consolidation and for budgeting and planning. It's really easy to use."

"The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel."

"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

"The product allows us to calculate the distributed cost across activities."

"Cube generation is a valuable feature."

"We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improved the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred due to the traceability feature."

"The product helped determine the organization's true cost of providing its products and services to customers."

Cons

"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."

"There can be an improvement in many regards with the dimensions, the metadata, the interfaces, as well as the integration."

"I would like to see more integrations with third-party vendors such as BigSense and SAP. I'm looking forward to seeing more interface-related content."

"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."

"Improvements might relate to the integration of the visual aspect of the product. There is a scope for improvement in the governance of the product."

"The user interface is in need of improvement. The forms should be more user-friendly."

"We still have issues and bugs because it's a new release."

"Oracle Hyperion's scalability could be improved."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

"The usability needs to be improved but bear in mind that we did not have the latest update."

"The interface is poorly designed and could really use an improvement to compete with other comparable software."

"We experienced severe performance issues when the models created are getting more details and becoming more complex."

"It could be made much more simpler. Most of the time it looks like a black box for developers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"The solution is affordable."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 7% of the time

Planful vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Oracle HFM vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 11% of the time

NICE Merced vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 9% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 8% of the time

Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 7% of the time

KCI CONTROL vs SAS Activity-Based Management

Compared 7% of the time

More SAS Activity-Based Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

March 2026

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

March 2026

Download SAS Activity-Based Management product report

Also Known As

Hyperion

No data available

Overview

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

SAS Activity-Based Management is an analytic application that models business processes to determine cost, profitability and drivers. With this solution, organizations can make informed decisions that streamline processes, deliver revenue growth and reduce costs across the organization.

SAS

Sample Customers

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Hyperion vs. SAS Activity-Based Management report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.