We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally)."
"We can write code in Java and it is easy to link to other JARs that we find on the internet, which is very handy."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"The scalability of the product is good."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"The most important feature is the Jenkins integration; it is pretty straight forward and allows us to run nightly builds."
"The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options."
"The tool is easy to use. The product gives me the flexibility to use Selenium. I can also use my Java capabilities in the solution."
"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"The free version of the solution is not user friendly at all."
"The tool's maintenance is very difficult since they do not follow call by value or call by reference. Due to this, any change happening is not reflected throughout all the test cases. There are some issues with data parameterization as well."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
"We have been seeing some error pop-ups that are difficult to understand why they were triggered."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
Earn 20 points
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 41 reviews while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Appium and Testim, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with . See our Katalon Studio vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.