Kaspersky Small Office Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kaspersky and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.5, while Seqrite is ranked #42. Kaspersky holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Total Security are competitors in the endpoint protection market. Kaspersky Total Security seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive threat detection and stable performance.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security offers features like inventory, asset management, and DLP solutions, including external device control and ransomware backup, providing detailed management capabilities. Kaspersky Total Security integrates all-in-one antivirus solutions, intrusion prevention systems, and uses machine learning and AI for advanced malware detection, along with offering a lightweight solution.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite requires improvements in stability and infrastructure integration, especially for macOS users, and enhancement in DLP feature coverage is necessary. Kaspersky could see enhancements in stability, a more user-friendly interface, and better email protection, alongside reducing its resource demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite enables flexible deployment across on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud environments, though its technical support varies in responsiveness. Kaspersky supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, offering good technical support online despite high resource demands.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite is often seen as a more cost-effective solution, especially suited for small to medium businesses, offering a better ROI than competitors like McAfee and Trend Micro. Kaspersky comes at a slightly higher price but justifies the cost with high security reliability, offering competitive pricing for its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,197 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Small Office Security is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Kaspersky Small Office Security	1.1%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	0.9%
Other	94.2%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Alessandro Spiandore

Proprietario at IL COMPUTER snc

Long-term licensing has provided reliable lightweight protection for commercial customers and maintains strong performance without disrupting existing security tools

Kaspersky Total Security is a lightweight solution that does not slow down Windows. In many years of use for my customers, I have not had any broken software or other problems. Safe Money technology is available in the product, but I do not use it because my customers have other security solutions that intercept malware before Kaspersky on the firewall and networking firewall of LAN. I sell the various solutions of next generation, Optimum, and Advanced through MCP licensing.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"These days it's machine-learning technology and behavior-based analytics features that make us more secure."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."

"The initial setup isn't too bad."

"What I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it is a comprehensive solution that contains everything the organization may need when using endpoints."

"Overall, it's a great platform; it integrates very well with other solutions from Palo Alto and also with our vendors, the ease of use is excellent, I love the root cause analysis from Cortex, which is amazing, and in a few clicks you can have the full root cause."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is useful for protecting laptops."

"There has been a return on investment for our small and medium business users."

"The most effective feature is its scanning. When they scan the viruses, they come back with the records quite fast. They make sure that they rectify."

"Kaspersky is reliable because it checks everything before I want to log in."

"It automatically identifies potential threats in emails, websites, and documents, swiftly blocking or quarantining anything harmful to prevent any damage or infection to my system."

"The software is easy to install."

"The protection has been top-notch, according to our use case and ISP."

"Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pros

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities."

"With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop."

"The update process and policy control are good."

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"Seqrite Endpoint Security provides external protection in terms of hard drives."

"The most valuable part of the solution is its ransomware backup feature."

"The solution is stable."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"There's an overall lack of features."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"Being able to filter the events to see those that are related to the actual alert would save time spent by the engineer."

"There is also no recovery feature; if some endpoint is under attack there must be the possibility of recovering it or restoring it to a normal state."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The tool could be cheaper."

"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"Regarding improvement, Kaspersky has a slightly larger system footprint, leading to a 5-10% performance slowdown compared to when I wasn't using Kaspersky."

"There is room for improving security."

"Kaspersky Total Security should be easier to manage and improve user interaction. Resetting often requires some experience, which can be a problem for generic users. Web users also encounter some issues that should be improved."

"Enhancing the encryption code, particularly in relation to ransomware would be a great addition for future use."

"The stability of the solution could be improved because we had some issues with the solution on non-Windows laptops."

"Anti-malware and anti-phishing policies in the solution are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security cons

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"The pricing could be a bit lower."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"In the next version, they should improve the areas of utility and centralized control."

"Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP."

"The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy."

"User management could be improved."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution."

"Kaspersky Total Security is a cheap solution."

"There is a need to renew the license on an annual basis."

"I like this solution due to its cost-free nature"

"The solution's pricing is cheap and better than that of Sophos."

"The pricing of the solution is good."

"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."

"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pricing and cost advice

"Endpoint Security is cheaper than Trend Micro."

"The license isn't expensive."

"We pay approximately $1,500 for licenses for the solution."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

"The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	48
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?

The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is perfect. The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is used by my commercial customers for security purposes. I do not use parental control beca...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 7% of the time

CatchPulse Pro vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 5% of the time

Comodo Internet Security for Business vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 4% of the time

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Small Office Security Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download Kaspersky Small Office Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kaspersky Total Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity suite offering robust protection through real-time monitoring, vulnerability fixing, and streamlined operations with centralized management.

Known for its lightweight performance and intuitive setup, Kaspersky Total Security effectively blocks threats across emails, websites, and documents. Continuous updates provide strong defenses against malware. Users find value in features like centralized management, which reduces manual workload, and a user-friendly interface. Adjustments can improve encryption, license renewal, anti-malware capabilities, and system stability while minimizing performance impact. Users recommend strengthened email protection, quicker responses to incidents, and enhanced configuration clarity, with flexibility in license upgrades and cost-effectiveness.

What are Kaspersky Total Security’s Key Features?

Vulnerability Fixing: Identifies and patches security gaps.
Real-time Monitoring: Continuous scanning for threats.
Endpoint Protection: Secures all connected devices.
Centralized Management: Simplifies cybersecurity operations.
Intrusion Prevention System: Blocks unauthorized network access.
Antispam and Firewall: Provides robust network safety.

What Benefits Can Users Expect?

Lightweight Performance: Does not slow down devices.
Pricing Efficiency: Offers good value for the cost.
User-Friendly Installation: Easy to deploy across systems.
Reduced Manual Tasks: Streamlines cybersecurity management.
Robust Malware Defense: Continuous updates enhance protection.

Kaspersky Total Security is used in banking systems, where securing internal data systems and enhancing endpoint protection are critical. Businesses leverage its encryption, firewall, and VPN services for comprehensive cybersecurity management. Its versatility supports protection across multiple devices, optimizing internal networks and processes for enhanced security and performance.

Kaspersky

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.