Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs Symantec Messaging Gateway comparison

Kaspersky and Broadcom are both solutions in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category. Kaspersky is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Kaspersky holds a 2.1% mindshare in SEG, compared to Broadcom’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Read 7 Kaspersky Security for Mail Server reviews

348 Views
143 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Messaging Gateway

Read 20 Symantec Messaging Gateway reviews

460 Views
132 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Symantec Messaging Gateway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Symantec Messaging Gateway and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server compete in the email security solutions category. Users often favor Kaspersky for its extensive features, suggesting it justifies its cost with comprehensive protection.

Features: Symantec Messaging Gateway is known for powerful content filtering, advanced filtering policies, and a robust spam database. Users find it stable and adaptable for on-premises setups, with easy deployment. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server offers reliable dependability and robust monitoring capabilities. Its integration features excel, providing a seamless user experience.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could enhance its reporting tools, unstructured data handling, and integration with Symantec Endpoint Protection. Recent support changes post-Broadcom acquisition have disappointed users, with clustering and threat handling areas needing attention. Kaspersky needs to improve stability and simplify the license renewal process. More robust monitoring of encrypted email attachments is necessary.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec provides options for on-premises and public cloud deployments, though support quality has been critiqued after Broadcom acquisition. Challenges with new features like OCR are evident. Kaspersky offers similar deployment options with stable inbuilt capabilities and satisfactory support, although there are issues with new feature implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Messaging Gateway’s pricing varies based on mailbox and email volume, with some users finding it expensive compared to Microsoft alternatives. Its comprehensive bundle provides effective security, offering ROI. Kaspersky, with a competitive pricing model, is cheaper than competitors like Barracuda, valued for its simplified cost structure and comprehensive access.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (30th)

Symantec Messaging Gateway

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Messaging Gateway is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

Taha Khaleel

Chief Operations Officer at PRO-VISION

A highly reliable solution that provides monitoring capabilities and protection to multiple types of devices

The initial setup of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is very easy. The initial setup of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server takes around four minutes. The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises. For the deployment process, you can buy the solution in a CD form or purchase it directly from the company website and activate it. My company needs managers, engineers, and developers to deploy the solution. The number of people required for the deployment process changes from time to time, so all the staff are included not just for the deployment of the solution but also to make improvements to the solution in the future. You can contact Kaspersky to see if they can provide the solution with integration capabilities for your company by providing you with an open account, which I haven't tried yet, though I plan to try it in the future.

Read full review

Girish Vijay

Deputy Manager IT at Carl Bechem Lubricants India Pvt. Ltd.

A stable and reasonably priced solution that performs well and has a very good malware database

Since Symantec merged with Broadcom, they might have lost some good technical engineers. Maybe that’s the reason why the product is performing poorly. When we have a good marketing and sales team, even though our product cannot perform, we will sell it at a high price because of the buzzwords. However, at the end of the day, the product should perform. Most of the products might not perform. Symantec is a very good product, but the services are basic. I rate the technical features of the product a nine out of ten. However, I would rate the services provided by the solution a six out of ten. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the product valuable because it provides easy integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls."

"The most valuable feature is the straightforward setup."

"The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities."

"The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it."

"You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail."

"We have achieved cost savings of up to thirty percent by using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution."

"I like that it's simple and easy to configure, deploy, and manage. The reporting function has all the features we're looking for, and we are fine with that."

"Messaging Gateway is stable."

"Symantec’s spyware and malware signature database is very good compared to other products."

"The most valuable features of Symantec Messaging Gateway are advanced content filtering, malware, and antivirus defense."

"The feature that I like the best is the fingerprinting concept."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the content filtering policies because the solution offers huge options for configuration, such as hardware manipulation, et cetera, and the dictionaries make the work easier."

"The solution is stable and the performance is good."

"It is a solid and stable product."

More Symantec Messaging Gateway pros

Cons

"Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

"I have only made contact via email, and it is a little slow. I would give customer service a rating of six or seven. Improving Spanish support would greatly benefit users."

"I rated the overall solution a five out of ten. If a user is looking for a low-budget solution with mid-level security without AI features, Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is suitable."

"Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users."

"It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

"The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement."

"The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license."

"The solution interface is from 2003 and is outdated. Symantec Messaging Gateway needs to update the interface."

"The solution takes up a lot of memory."

"Symantec Messaging Gateway can improve detection because most of them are false negatives or false positives that we are trying to troubleshoot. Additionally, we are having routing problems and they are somehow connected to DNS issues."

"It is a nice product but is not user friendly in terms of the graphical interface. It is poor and is not rich in terms of the human interface."

"They have updated the version of the Messaging Gateway and the new features they are adding the need to be re-evaluated. They have done some changes on the policy."

"It will provide Excel reports and PDF reports, but it would be great if they supported the concept of Crystal Reports."

"In a later release, it would be nice if the messaging gateway supported the cluster feature."

"What's lacking when you compare it with Proofpoint and other threat protection solutions is that it does the basic stuff, but we need more advanced threat handling."

More Symantec Messaging Gateway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."

"The solution is not expensive."

"Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."

"My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."

"It's a bit expensive compared to its competitor Barracuda Email Security Gateway but cheaper than Sophos Email."

"They're a little costly compared to Microsoft."

"For 150 users, we pay INR 1,60,000."

"A subscription for technical support costs extra."

"Symantec Messaging Gateway’s pricing is very cheap."

"The cost of Symantec Messaging Gateway is too expensive in general. However, the appliance also includes the price of the license in the same bundle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

The pricing is moderate. It is not expensive but not cheap either. For Mexico, a good price is about 20 dollars per agent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

I believe integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls and a feature similar to a SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ) within the Kaspersky environment wo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Messaging Gateway?

Symantec is a secure product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Messaging Gateway?

The solution takes up a lot of memory. The system becomes slow. The performance must be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Messaging Gateway?

We use the solution to secure our data and emails.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiMail vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 31% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 10% of the time

Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 10% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Competitors

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) vs Symantec Messaging Gateway

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Symantec Messaging Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Email vs Symantec Messaging Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail vs Symantec Messaging Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Symantec Messaging Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

More Symantec Messaging Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

June 2025

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report

Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Messaging Gateway

May 2025

Download Symantec Messaging Gateway product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec.cloud, Symantec Email Security.cloud

Overview

Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

Kaspersky

Symantec Messaging Gateway is a comprehensive email security solution designed to protect organizations from advanced threats and spam. It combines multiple layers of protection, including anti-malware, anti-spam, and data loss prevention, to safeguard sensitive information and ensure email continuity.

With its advanced threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks, such as ransomware and spear-phishing. The solution also offers robust encryption and authentication features to secure email communications.

Its intuitive management console provides administrators with granular control and real-time visibility into email traffic. Symantec Messaging Gateway is a reliable and scalable solution that helps organizations mitigate email-borne threats and maintain a secure messaging environment.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher

Doric, Joblink Plus, Our Lady of Mercy College, Parramatta, PPB Advisory, Slater & Gordon Lawyers, Sydney Adventist Hospital Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway

April 2025

Free Report: Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway report.

See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.