Top 10 Symantec Messaging Gateway Alternatives

Name: Symantec Messaging Gateway
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 4.1 (20 reviews)

Vendor: Broadcom

4.1 out of 5

20 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Symantec Messaging Gateway Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Messaging Gateway based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, and Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 secures email with features like Safe Links and phishing protection and integrates with Azure and Microsoft Sentinel to enhance security. It offers seamless functions and email protection against phishing and spam. Users face challenges in UI navigation and threat detection while seeking better global support and licensing models.

Download Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

It's a user-base subscription.

From the pricing point of view, like any other product in the market, there is scope for negotiation.

View comparison

Pricing

It's a user-base subscription.

From the pricing point of view, like any other product in the market, there is scope for negotiation.

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Symantec Messaging Gateway excels in spam and malware filtering while offering scalability and ease of use, appealing to those seeking robust on-premises solutions. In comparison, Proofpoint Email Protection delivers extensive threat protection, suitable for those prioritizing advanced attack prevention despite higher costs.

Download Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection requires higher upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection requires higher upfront investment.

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

4.0 out of 5

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

4.0 out of 5

Mimecast excels in advanced threat protection and cloud integration, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security features. In comparison, Symantec is valued for on-premises scalability and management, making it suitable for environments emphasizing in-depth spam and malware protection.

Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway has an initial setup cost that can be high, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for a simplified and potentially more cost-effective setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway has an initial setup cost that can be high, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for a simplified and potentially more cost-effective setup process.

Kiteworks

4.3 out of 5

Kiteworks

4.3 out of 5

Symantec Messaging Gateway excels in email protection with anti-spam and malware defense, fitting on-premises setups. In comparison, Kiteworks supports secure file management and flexibility, offering robust file transfer features and security measures, catering to hybrid and cloud environments.

Download Kiteworks vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway has been noted for its moderate setup costs, while Kiteworks is generally recognized for having higher initial setup expenses. This distinction highlights the cost differences between these two messaging security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Email Security Gateway

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Email Security Gateway

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Email Security Gateway offers extensive customization and cloud-based quarantine features ideal for diverse security needs. In comparison, Symantec Messaging Gateway prioritizes advanced content filtering and malware defense suitable for organizations seeking robust protection. Both products cater to distinct security and integration requirements.

Download Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Barracuda Email Security Gateway offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost advantages, while Symantec Messaging Gateway is noted for a more complex setup, potentially leading to higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Collaboration Security

4.4 out of 5

Trellix Collaboration Security

4.4 out of 5

Symantec Messaging Gateway offers superior pricing and support, excelling in content filtering and customization, ideal for on-premises deployment. In comparison, Trellix Collaboration Security delivers advanced features like fingerprinting and keyword mapping, suiting businesses needing superior cloud integration and email encryption capabilities.

Download Symantec Messaging Gateway vs. Trellix Collaboration Security Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway requires a moderate setup cost with straightforward installation, while Trellix Collaboration Security demands a higher investment and complex configuration, highlighting significant differences in initial deployment expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiMail Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiMail Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Symantec Messaging Gateway focuses on advanced content filtering and scalability, appealing to those seeking straightforward management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiMail Cloud offers extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for those requiring robust anti-spam features and seamless integration within the Fortinet ecosystem.

Download Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway is noted for its relatively higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiMail Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a clear distinction in pricing approach between these two email security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

3.8 out of 5

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Messaging Gateway excels in scalability and advanced content filtering, making it suitable for businesses needing flexible deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Security offers comprehensive protection and reliable monitoring, appealing to users prioritizing email security and cost-effectiveness.

Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec Messaging Gateway Report

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway generally requires less setup cost compared to Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, which may involve higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Messaging Gateway generally requires less setup cost compared to Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, which may involve higher initial expenses.

Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix

3.5 out of 5

Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix

3.5 out of 5

Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix provides secure email communications, ensuring message privacy. Key features include robust encryption and easy integration. Users value its reliability but note the need for enhanced reporting tools. Its strong focus on data security meets business communication needs.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, I believe they provide excellent value.

View comparison

Pricing

In terms of pricing, I believe they provide excellent value.

Related categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Email Archiving

Email Security