

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert compete in the EDR solutions category. Trellix EDR often receives positive feedback for its support and pricing, while Kaspersky EDR Expert is noted for its advanced features, suggesting it may be worth the investment.
Features: Trellix EDR is praised for its real-time threat detection, integration with other security tools, and robust incident response capabilities. Kaspersky EDR Expert receives acclaim for its detailed analytics, machine learning capabilities, and automated response mechanisms. Users generally find Kaspersky's advanced detection features more valuable.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Trellix EDR could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities, streamlined processes to reduce complexity, and better documentation. Kaspersky EDR Expert feedback indicates a need for better documentation, a more intuitive setup process, and improved user interface. Both products have room for optimization, but Trellix's complexity seems to be a recurrent concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is often noted for its relatively straightforward deployment and robust customer support, which users find helpful. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR Expert is seen as more challenging to deploy but offers equally strong customer service. The key difference lies in the initial deployment experience, with Trellix being more user-friendly.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is generally seen as cost-effective, with users highlighting its good return on investment given the features provided. Kaspersky EDR Expert is perceived as more expensive, but users feel the higher cost is justified by its advanced capabilities and effectiveness in threat detection and response.
I rate the technical support from Kaspersky a 10, as they respond quickly with engineers joining the conversation within three to five minutes.
I have my own independent team for Kaspersky deployment and operational support, so I am not dependent on Kaspersky's backend technical support.
From my perspective, the local team and the support team of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert need to be more accurate and more responsible.
I have contracted support and also have an operating control so I can get various types of support.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is very scalable, working with high availability techniques across three main data centers in my organization.
I believe Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is scalable, as I can keep adding agents without hard limitations.
It effectively detects new applications and requires whitelisting based on assessments discussed with the technical teams or vendors.
Customers using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert can manage environments with as few as 100 endpoints or as many as 5,000 endpoints very effectively.
I haven't found any issues with this particular solution, and there's no room for improvement for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert.
A centralized dashboard is a primary requirement, as it would facilitate easier management without needing to install multiple agents.
Deployment with the console directly, without depending on other workers to deploy the agents, would be beneficial.
Compared to my previous product, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is not up to the mark; it's below my rating.
I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment.
The pricing is nominal when we compare it with other solutions.
Compared to other products, the pricing for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is almost the same.
The ATP functionality is quite strong because it utilizes the behavioral analytics engine in the backend, which employs machine learning mechanisms to identify any kind of vulnerability or exploit running on the operating system level and the network level.
Almost all our clients use the Patch Management, vulnerability, and integration feature.
The product is strong enough and capable of handling the type of detections as protection and security.
I have spent efforts on training our managers and others - what can software do if the knowledge base is low?
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert | 1.6% |
| Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to detect and respond to advanced threats in real time. It combines advanced threat intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and behavioral analysis to provide proactive protection against sophisticated attacks.
With its centralized management console, security teams can easily monitor and investigate incidents, while automated response capabilities enable quick remediation. This solution offers deep visibility into endpoint activities, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a powerful tool for enhancing the overall security posture of businesses, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.
Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.
Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.
Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.