We performed a comparison between JSCAPE by Redwood and TIBCO Managed File Transfer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It keeps a clear record of all the file transfers that take place, the person who initiated them, and the outcome of the execution."
"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."
"Triggers are something that is very useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code, and we can define certain functionality of certain tasks also."
"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."
"The user interface feels easy to use."
"The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering."
"Triggers are also something that is useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code."
"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."
"TIBCO has its own integration tool."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to do centralized administration."
"They have great multi-factor authentication for extra security."
"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."
"The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming."
"The product's pricing needs improvement."
"The GUI has to be enhanced."
"The price is too high and the product line is too complex."
"The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."
"The FTP/S and ad-hoc techniques can further be automated."
"Iteratively enhancing the user interface could help with streamlining workflows to make them more intuitive and user-friendly."
"The UI could be better."
"Their cloud product is not yet stable."
"I think some of the automated deployment features could use some assistance, which is an area where it currently lacks. The product needs some ability to help it with the deployment model, which is a little difficult."
JSCAPE by Redwood is ranked 8th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 21 reviews while TIBCO Managed File Transfer is ranked 15th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 3 reviews. JSCAPE by Redwood is rated 9.0, while TIBCO Managed File Transfer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of JSCAPE by Redwood writes "Versatile, streamlines the entire file transfer procedure, and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Managed File Transfer writes "Serves as a straightforward SFTP server that offers reasonably good support". JSCAPE by Redwood is most compared with MOVEit, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, Control-M, ActiveBatch by Redwood and Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer, whereas TIBCO Managed File Transfer is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, MOVEit and CA XCOM Data Transport. See our JSCAPE by Redwood vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer report.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
