Aspera Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

IBM and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Redwood Software is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0. IBM holds a 3.1% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Read 4 Aspera Managed File Transfer reviews

777 Views
754 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,008 Views
988 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Aspera Managed File Transfer

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Aspera Managed File Transfer and JSCAPE by Redwood compete in the managed file transfer market. Aspera holds an advantage in speed with its high-speed transfer technology, whereas JSCAPE's strength lies in its comprehensive integration capabilities.

Features: Aspera Managed File Transfer offers high-speed transfers with FASP technology, ensuring rapid and secure data movement. It provides robust security features and supports scalable deployment for growing business needs. JSCAPE by Redwood stands out with multi-protocol support, advanced automation features, and extensive system integration options, making it ideal for businesses seeking flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aspera Managed File Transfer offers an easy deployment process focused on speed, with a strong support team for rapid transfer setups. JSCAPE by Redwood provides a flexible deployment model, emphasizing personalized customer service for complex system integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Aspera Managed File Transfer requires a significant initial investment, offering good ROI for businesses needing fast transfers. JSCAPE by Redwood presents a more cost-effective solution, with long-term ROI associated with its integration capabilities and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera Managed File Transfer is 3.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JSCAPE by Redwood	4.5%
Aspera Managed File Transfer	3.1%
Other	92.4%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases

Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.

Read full review

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Versatile, streamlines the entire file transfer procedure, and offers good support

It might provide a more sophisticated and user-friendly experience, encouraging smoother interactions and facilitating simpler navigation for users using the application. The user interface (UI) could be improved. The absence of an extensive collection of ample training videos and comprehensive documentation within the current framework represents a missed opportunity. It could have greatly benefited new users, as such resources could have provided invaluable guidance, insights, and step-by-step instructions, ultimately aiding in the swift acclimatization to the software's functionalities and subsequently fostering a more intuitive and less daunting onboarding process for individuals who are just beginning to explore and engage with the software's capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers."

"It offers audit trails and reporting tools, allowing users to track file transfers, monitor user activities, and produce regulatory compliance reports."

"The speed of transferring large datasets is super quick, which allows us to work on multiple tasks at a time."

"Valuable features include a comprehensive management UI and a strictly controlled managed file transfer."

"The user interface feels easy to use."

"The automation part of JSCAPE by Redwood is great because you can set up a scheduled delivery with files and be notified if the transfer was successful."

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."

"The user-friendly interface has made it easy for fresh users to adopt it."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."

"If you want to do a file transfer between two countries, and one is not China, then you have other more affordable options."

"If there is any failure in the data transfer and it can automatically detect and reinitiate it, that would be great."

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."

"The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."

"The user interface (UI) could be improved."

"They could create an in-depth document so that any user with little to no background can implement this and use the software effectively."

"The price is too high and the product line is too complex."

"With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

"Setup is time-consuming."

"Database crashing was seen whenever there was an overload."

"Support for more complicated workflows, such as conditional logic or branching, could be added to allow users to create more advanced automation processes."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was close to $10,000 to $20,000."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?

There are other products of Aspera which come as add-ons, however, we haven't purchased those, like report generation, since that was not our requirement. The features we needed were included in th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aspera Managed File Transfer?

We have an office in China, and we wanted to transfer data from China to the UK. We have an office in the UK as well.

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 51% of the time

webMethods.io vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 12% of the time

Kiteworks vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

CloudDat vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 38% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 37% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

Control-M vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2025

Download Aspera Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

IBM

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Free Report: Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.