JFrog Xray vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JFrog Logo
278 views|202 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
14,255 views|10,885 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JFrog Xray and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first.""JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.""Good reporting functionalities.""I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes.""JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning.""The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy.""The solution is stable and reliable."

More JFrog Xray Pros →

"Support is knowledgeable.""The initial setup process is simple.""The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy.""Initial setup was pretty straightforward.""Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning.""This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives.""The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful.""The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."

More Tenable Security Center Pros →

Cons
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things.""JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved.""I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images.""Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool.""Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs.""The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance.""JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."

More JFrog Xray Cons →

"At times we have had the typical bugs.""We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with""If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic.""The tool's initial configuration is not so easy.""The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor.""The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool.""We are facing some challenges related to our channel.""The user interface can be improved."

More Tenable Security Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."
  • "We're able to save because we don't have to employ more staff members to help wit ht he scheduling of the scans, running the reports or sending them out to the systems owners. That alone is a big ROI for us."
  • "The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."
  • "The pricing is more than Nexpose."
  • "Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."
  • "We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."
  • "We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."
  • "The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."
  • More Tenable Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.
    Top Answer:There is a tool called DefectDojo for reporting. Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore… more »
    Top Answer:We use this solution to identify vulnerabilities in the dependency file. We have the Artifactory package which integrates with Xray-like plugins. We can automatically plug this tool into Xray to… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive.
    Top Answer:The tool's initial configuration is not so easy. The hardware requirements related to the tool need to be better because we need a lot of memory to achieve speed in the solution. If our company needs… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    Views
    278
    Comparisons
    202
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    495
    Rating
    8.2
    1st
    Views
    14,255
    Comparisons
    10,885
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    431
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JFrog Security Essentials
    Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
    Learn More
    Overview

    JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].

    If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.

    As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"​

    Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

    Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

    Sample Customers
    google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook
    IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Security Center
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JFrog Xray is ranked 17th in Vulnerability Management with 7 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. JFrog Xray is rated 8.2, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". JFrog Xray is most compared with Black Duck, Snyk, Mend.io, Veracode and Trivy, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai. See our JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Security Center report.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.