No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Kaseya VSA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Ma...
Ranking in Patch Management
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaseya VSA
Ranking in Patch Management
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya VSA is 5.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kaseya VSA5.3%
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management0.9%
Other93.8%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AK
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
Patching tasks have become efficient and automated, saving significant time
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and batch management The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.…
FN
Senior Manager at dinCloud, Inc.
Lightweight tool aids in remote management but needs better support
Primarily, we are using it for remote monitoring and management as an MSP. We are basically a reseller; we are a service provider, so Kaseya VSA is one of our tools which we use for our managed services The best features of Kaseya VSA are that it's lightweight over the machine and does not create…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"The most valuable features of Kaseya VSA are remote control, live connect, and automation."
"The solution was scalable."
"The product has allowed the company to provide faster service, which means higher customer satisfaction because when we do our jobs faster and more efficiently, the customer is happier."
"We have all the necessary modules for monitoring on the server and workstations."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable features of Kaseya VSA are remote control, live connect, and automation."
"VSA installs an agent on every computer that allows users to create a help desk ticket with one click. That's why I chose VSA. Many users never create tickets when they have a problem. Sometimes I won't know about an issue until they run into me and say, "Hey, this has been broken for two months.""
"It is probably the most helpful tool in any toolbox for the MSP world."
 

Cons

"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
"The solution is hard to use at first until you understand how it works."
"The GUI is not user-friendly. You have to search and dig deep into the options to find things."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"Sometimes, the product misinterprets the functionality of a machine."
"Its scripting language kind of sucked. They have their own version of PowerShell inside VSA. if you want to reach out and grab endpoint information, for instance, to know how many end devices have a program installed, you actually have to write a script for that. It wasn't like how it is in CrowdStrike where you can just do a search, and it just happened. In VSA, you have to write your own script to do it. In terms of new features, an integrated MDM for mobile devices would be awesome."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
"The main difference would be the addition of audio transfer between the end-user and the remote connectivity software. That is the one critical piece that we are currently lacking."
"The response to bugs is slow and software improvement comes slowly too."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is robust and the price is good for the features that are provided."
"We were looking at a price of $22.50 cents per user."
"Kaseya VSA can be described as a fairly priced product."
"It depends on what products you want. Kaseya loves packages, and if you are packaging, it is more affordable. If you're not packaging, it tends to be a little bit more expensive than others."
"With the on-prem, you buy the agent license. That's a one-time fee, and it varies depending on how many you have. You also pay annual maintenance on the number that you have. So, there are two fees involved: a one-time fee and a recurring fee."
"You're going to pay for this solution, but you're going to get so much more out of it in reporting, asset management, and the ability to manage your clients. I would recommend giving Kaseya serious consideration and I would recommend implementing it."
"Licensing is available on a yearly basis and is priced per node."
"It is, in my opinion, competitive in the market. It is determined by the number of users and licenses needed. Depending on the license count of users, the price ranges from $10 to $80 USD."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Performing Arts
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
Reporting ( /categories/reporting ) needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth. Another area that needs enhancement is the integration with proxies, as better integration would be ben...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management ( /products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management-reviews ) is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and...
What needs improvement with Kaseya VSA?
So far, everything is good, but regarding automation scripts, I would like to see improved or enhanced scripting capabilities where I can create scripts based on automation by using AI. So far, eve...
What is your primary use case for Kaseya VSA?
I am currently working with remote monitoring and management solutions, primarily for patch management. I could describe a few use cases for it, and I use it for that.
What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya VSA?
I will share my rich experience with Kaseya VSA with others, and I suggest using Kaseya VSA. I gave this review a rating of 9.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Aconex 4. Adidas 5. AIG 6. Airbus 7. Akamai 8. Alibaba 9. Allianz 10. Amazon 11. American Express 12. Aon 13. Apple 14. ATT 15. Autodesk 16. Aviva 17. Bank of America 18. Barclays 19. Bayer 20. Bechtel 21. BlackRock 22. Boeing 23. BNP Paribas 24. Cisco 25. CocaCola 26. Comcast 27. Credit Suisse 28.Cushman Wakefield 29. Dell 30. Deutsche Bank 31. eBay
Sage UK, MSP, CodeBlue Ltd, Connect Work Place Solutions, All Covered, 501cTech, Chairo Christian School, Green Duck
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.