No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management vs Kaseya VSA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Ma...
Ranking in Patch Management
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaseya VSA
Ranking in Patch Management
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya VSA is 5.3%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kaseya VSA5.3%
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management0.8%
Other93.9%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AK
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
Patching tasks have become efficient and automated, saving significant time
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and batch management The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.…
FN
Senior Manager at dinCloud, Inc.
Lightweight tool aids in remote management but needs better support
Primarily, we are using it for remote monitoring and management as an MSP. We are basically a reseller; we are a service provider, so Kaseya VSA is one of our tools which we use for our managed services The best features of Kaseya VSA are that it's lightweight over the machine and does not create…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"The remote management is quite good, and the patch management and service desk are great features of the solution."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"Our ROI is probably about six months, and we started seeing real improvement in our efficiency at that point because we were still finding new things we wanted to do with the solution."
"I like the remote control, audit, inventory, patch management, software management, and monitoring features."
"As a small IT shop, the weird feature that the VSA has that I have not found anywhere else is they have these little colored dots that tell you the status of the machine. Is it offline and powered up? Is it actively being used? Is it idle? A lot of our clients ask us to do things for them, but, of course, they don't really want us to be underfoot. So we always look for, "Hey, there's an idle machine. We can work on that one now." And to say it makes it easy, we can do that at a glance. In any other tool we've looked at, you have to go several layers deep to see if the machine is in use, and you could spend your entire day just trying to find a machine that was idle, whereas, with Kaseya VSA, you can tell at a glance."
"The patch management and the remote support are very good, especially the remote support. There is a module built into the solution which allows remote control without necessarily interrupting the user. We could manage things in the background without them seeing or interacting with anything, which is a very useful feature."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to offer control remotely to its users and provide patching capabilities to users."
"The product is quite affordable compared to other RMM solutions on the market and we only have a few complaints."
 

Cons

"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
"The audit and KNM tools could improve."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"The majority of end users ask if there are any notifications or advice regarding when they purchased the hardware and software and when it will expire or need to be replaced, and there are none in Kaseya."
"However, we were hacked, and for a few weeks, it was quite bad."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control strengths."
"The GUI is not user-friendly. You have to search and dig deep into the options to find things."
"The user interface is somewhat outdated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Kaseya's come down in pricing when I compare it to TeamViewer or other cheaper RMMs like LogMeIn."
"Customers purchase the solutions because it is priced well. There are additional services that have an additional cost."
"It is, in my opinion, competitive in the market. It is determined by the number of users and licenses needed. Depending on the license count of users, the price ranges from $10 to $80 USD."
"You're going to pay for this solution, but you're going to get so much more out of it in reporting, asset management, and the ability to manage your clients. I would recommend giving Kaseya serious consideration and I would recommend implementing it."
"I think it costs more than ManageEngine."
"Kaseya VSA can be described as a fairly priced product."
"The dollar exchange rate in Brazil is very high, so the price should be better for our country."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
894,830 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Performing Arts
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
Reporting ( /categories/reporting ) needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth. Another area that needs enhancement is the integration with proxies, as better integration would be ben...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management?
The primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management ( /products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management-reviews ) is patching both servers and computers. I am using it for security control and...
What needs improvement with Kaseya VSA?
So far, everything is good, but regarding automation scripts, I would like to see improved or enhanced scripting capabilities where I can create scripts based on automation by using AI. So far, eve...
What is your primary use case for Kaseya VSA?
I am currently working with remote monitoring and management solutions, primarily for patch management. I could describe a few use cases for it, and I use it for that.
What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya VSA?
I will share my rich experience with Kaseya VSA with others, and I suggest using Kaseya VSA. I gave this review a rating of 9.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Aconex 4. Adidas 5. AIG 6. Airbus 7. Akamai 8. Alibaba 9. Allianz 10. Amazon 11. American Express 12. Aon 13. Apple 14. ATT 15. Autodesk 16. Aviva 17. Bank of America 18. Barclays 19. Bayer 20. Bechtel 21. BlackRock 22. Boeing 23. BNP Paribas 24. Cisco 25. CocaCola 26. Comcast 27. Credit Suisse 28.Cushman Wakefield 29. Dell 30. Deutsche Bank 31. eBay
Sage UK, MSP, CodeBlue Ltd, Connect Work Place Solutions, All Covered, 501cTech, Chairo Christian School, Green Duck
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: May 2026.
894,830 professionals have used our research since 2012.