


JupiterOne and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in security and endpoint management. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is considered superior due to its comprehensive feature set, though JupiterOne is more favored for pricing and support.
Features: JupiterOne offers automated asset discovery, graph-based visualizations, and compliance mapping with SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Its customizable security queries and integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, and CloudTrail are highlights. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management features AI-powered automation, centralized management, and real-time endpoint visibility. It includes automated patching across endpoints and a unified IT and security operations platform.
Room for Improvement: JupiterOne could enhance user interface customization and integration flexibility with additional third-party apps. The complexity of initial setup may be reduced for broader accessibility. Documentation could be expanded for advanced features. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management could improve the speed of software updates and enhance reporting capabilities. Its patch management interface may benefit from additional user guidance. Privilege management could be more robust for increased endpoint control.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JupiterOne offers straightforward deployment with efficient customer service, ensuring rapid integration. Ivanti provides flexible deployment options with responsive support, allowing tailored implementations for complex requirements.
Pricing and ROI: JupiterOne is cost-effective, offering competitive pricing with a solid ROI. Ivanti, while more expensive, delivers substantial ROI through its advanced features and automation capabilities. The higher cost is justified by Ivanti's comprehensive endpoint management.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
The number of tickets for our IT team has drastically reduced, which saves time, increases productivity, and allows the IT team to focus on essential tasks rather than minor issues with employee devices.
We can remove or add licenses according to business requirements, and it is all controlled within the application.
The client was already paying for Microsoft Intune and was able to decommission Ivanti Neurons for UEM.
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
From a support perspective, they are fantastic, usually very good at getting back to us in a timely manner.
I am concerned about consistently needing to call support for installing brand new solutions.
They are responsive, stick to time, and are enthusiastic about helping.
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
Transitioning from low to high capacity in seconds.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten.
There is no limitation in scalability; Ivanti Neurons for MDM is very scalable.
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
We have not seen any downtime.
Regarding the self-healing capabilities, I would say it has reduced downtime by around thirty to forty percent.
It delivers very good UEM capabilities.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.
In an enterprise environment, while automation is powerful, strong guardrails, approval workflows, and clear audit trails, along with rollback capabilities and the ability to control the scope of automated actions, are essential.
In Cherwell, we receive an overall average rating based on the tickets worked on, which I find missing in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management.
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
This is not a cheap solution.
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are on the high side.
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.
It integrates into InTune, which enables us to detect, diagnose, and fix issues without manual intervention.
AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work.
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.
What are the most important features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.
JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.
JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
What are JupiterOne's key features?In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.