ITRS Geneos vs Meraki Dashboard comparison

ITRS and Cisco are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #63 with an average rating of 6.5, while Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5. ITRS holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Cisco’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

1,134 Views
654 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Meraki Dashboard

Read 55 Meraki Dashboard reviews

2,394 Views
1,766 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Meraki Dashboard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Meraki Dashboard compete in the realm of system monitoring, each catering to different needs. While Geneos shines in real-time monitoring tailored for financial environments, Meraki stands out for its simplicity and ease of use, making it preferable for many users.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and powerful automation, making it ideal for enterprise systems in financial sectors. It provides integration options and extensive plug-ins for a comprehensive monitoring experience. Meraki Dashboard provides a cloud-based platform with multisite visibility and simple configuration, focusing on user-friendly analytics suited for small to medium-sized businesses.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos requires enhancements in historical data logging, flexible configuration, and integrations for modern technologies. Users have noted difficulties with some features and seek a more intuitive setup. Meraki Dashboard could benefit from improved licensing management, enhanced diagnostic tools, and more comprehensive APIs. Its functionality may be limited for larger operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is an on-premises solution with complex deployment, demanding significant expertise. Meraki Dashboard offers flexible deployment, including public and private clouds, simplifying remote management. Both platforms receive praise for customer service, yet Meraki Dashboard is noted for its quality and responsiveness. Geneos provides robust support but faces critiques for slow responses in some regions.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is perceived as costly for smaller companies due to high upfront costs and complex licensing, but it provides ROI through reduced incidents and improved insights. Meraki Dashboard also incurs significant costs for advanced licenses but is valued for ease of use and integration, justifying the price with management simplicity and visibility. Both are premium offerings, reflecting their comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (35th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd)

Meraki Dashboard

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Meraki Dashboard is 1.3%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Bilal-Ahmed

IT Manager at Fawaz

Seamless connectivity and comprehensive control over network devices

All of the features we are looking for are already in control. I think those features, which we are not currently utilizing, are already there. For example, the control for the cameras and everything else. The cameras are not connected through Meraki, but all other devices are on Meraki networks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of Geneos is the fact that we can clearly see, if we have an alert, where that alert has come from. We can see the data around that alert and anything that might be relevant is also shown. We can very easily right-click and see why we've received that alert. That's the best part about it, that you've got all the data there with the alerting."

"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"The Netprobe is so lightweight compared to the agents that most monitoring tools use. It's really superior to the competition. The agent that is used by almost every competitive tool takes a lot more system resources. It's slower and it requires a greater effort and more compromises in terms of security to install on the monitored servers. With Geneos, because it lives outside the code, it is far easier and far less taxing on the monitored systems."

"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"The most valuable feature is ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of Meraki Dashboard is we can manage our switches and access point in one place."

"The ease-of-use and the analytics are really effective tools."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity in navigating through the dashboard. It's well set out, and the layout is nice and user friendly. A lot of clients enjoy seeing layer 7 visibility. They get a good indication and insight into what is happening in their network and what applications are being used the most. They can then customize and give preference to business-critical applications."

"There are some whitelist blacklist capabilities in the MX dashboard, which is very helpful."

"We've been spending a lot less time on tickets and deployments, so we have more time to do other things."

"Meraki Dashboard offers an exceptional centralized management solution that allows easy updates and monitoring of various network features, including bandwidth usage and content filtering."

"We like the visibility this solution gives us of the infrastructure."

More Meraki Dashboard pros

Cons

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."

"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"It would be nicer if the dashboard was lighter."

"The coverage has been an issue for us."

"Meraki Dashboard's pricing could be improved."

"The tool is useful for managing devices and monitoring their current state, but it falls short in troubleshooting network issues, particularly with access points. It does not provide a complete understanding of the root causes of the issues. As a result, network engineers have had to use additional tools to complement it and conduct assessments. The only way to improve the tool would be to enhance its capability to identify and resolve network issues effectively."

"The one issue that we have had is that the VPN tunnel would go down unless you worked out with the ISP that you would be using a static IP address on the WAN interface."

"The price could be lower because the license for access points is expensive."

"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."

"It would be helpful to have the ability to create a floor plan based on an existing PDF or JPEG, which is automatically converted into a usable network map."

More Meraki Dashboard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"The licensing fees are $180 USD, per AP, for three years."

"You don't have to pay for the dashboard."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The Meraki Dashboard has more competitive pricing."

"The pricing for a small setup is only a few hundred dollars a year. The fee is subscription-based."

"The price of Meraki Dashboard is not expensive because knowing that it is a cloud-based solution has its benefits."

"I’m not sure of the exact cost, however, it’s my understanding the Meraki WiFi is around $800. That’s for a three-year license. It’s about $150 a year."

"Licensing is around under 1000 pounds. The licensing is either one year, three years, five years or ten years and during the licensing, we can choose to renew it per year or per every three years. We've got a license for three years. It's about 160 or about 200 pounds each."

More Meraki Dashboard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Meraki Dashboard?

We greatly utilize the network because we can plug it into the DNS, VPN, or equipment. It's very good. Meraki Dashboard enhances wireless network management. We appreciate its flexibility, as it al...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki Dashboard?

The cost of the Meraki solution is high, which may not be affordable for smaller companies, especially in developing countries.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Meraki Dashboard?

There is a need for price reductions in developing countries, as the cost of Meraki is quite high. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Meraki Dashboard could integrate more Cisco devices such a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Cisco DNA Center vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 21% of the time

Zabbix vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 13% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 13% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 6% of the time

More Meraki Dashboard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard

April 2025

Download Meraki Dashboard product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Meraki Dashboard is a comprehensive cloud-based platform that offers centralized management and control for all Meraki networking and security products. It provides a user-friendly interface, allowing administrators to easily monitor and configure their network infrastructure from anywhere. With real-time visibility, troubleshooting becomes effortless, ensuring optimal performance and minimizing downtime.

The intuitive dashboard offers a holistic view of the network, enabling quick identification of potential issues and proactive measures. It simplifies network deployment and scaling, with zero-touch provisioning and automatic firmware updates. The robust security features include advanced threat protection, content filtering, and VPN connectivity.

Meraki Dashboard also offers powerful analytics and reporting capabilities, providing valuable insights into network usage, application performance, and user behavior. With its seamless integration and scalability,

Meraki Dashboard is the ideal solution for organizations of all sizes, ensuring efficient network management and enhanced productivity.

Cisco

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Coop eG, Peet's Coffee & Tea, Priefert Manufacturing, Century Care Management, Clifton College, Zürs Ski Resort, Capital FM Arena, MAXI Autohöfe

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard

April 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Meraki Dashboard report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.