Invicti vs w3af comparison

The compared Invicti and w3af solutions aren't in the same category. Invicti is ranked #4 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 8.3% mindshare in the category. w3af is ranked #39 in AS , and holds a 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of w3af users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,717 Views
855 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

w3af

Read 1 w3af review

675 Views
587 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

w3af

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Invicti and w3af based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Container Security (25th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (8th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

w3af

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (39th)

Mindshare comparison

Invicti and w3af aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Invicti is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 8.3%, up 5.7% compared to last year.
w3af, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	8.3%
Veracode	17.2%
Checkmarx One	16.4%
Other	58.1%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
w3af	0.6%
SonarQube	16.3%
Checkmarx One	9.9%
Other	73.19999999999999%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Omar Sánchez (Mr.Tech)

Information Security Advisor, CISO & CIO, Docutek Services at Docutek Services

It's buggy and seems to try to do too many things, but having this on a USB drive has been valuable.

I tried to install this on numerous systems and eventually, with help, I got it running. It needs far too many dependencies installed and there's too much messing about to be of much use. Once running, it's buggy and begs the question can it be relied upon? Even within Kali it reports website time-outs, yet Zap or Burp are able to do a successful scan. I wanted this to work so much and be able to use it as an additional check of my results but have now binned it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would definitely recommend it to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding security."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."

More Invicti pros

"The best free software for pen testing web applications."

Cons

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"I find that the scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"Sometimes, it is slow; when we are running this application and browsing other applications concurrently, it makes other applications work slow."

More Invicti cons

"Unfortunately, once you get around the seemingly strict set of pre-requisites to install it, it is incredibly buggy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price should be 20% lower"

"It is competitive in the security market."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs w3af

Compared 18% of the time

Checkmarx One vs w3af

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs w3af

Compared 11% of the time

Waratek ARMR vs w3af

Compared 11% of the time

Jscrambler vs w3af

Compared 9% of the time

More w3af Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

March 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download w3af product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting all web application vulnerabilities. Our framework is proudly developed using Python to be easy to use and extend, and licensed under GPLv2.0.

w3af

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.