No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DRBD
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of DRBD is 13.6%, up from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 14.6%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Windows Server Failover Clustering14.6%
DRBD13.6%
Other71.8%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

it_user302112 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant IT Infrastructure at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
It's kept data synchronized between multiple nodes in different datacenters, though it should have its own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments.
Working with DRBD can be complex and it takes time to understand how it works. Especially split-brain scenarios need to be handled carefully. When it comes to multi-master setups, which are possible with the latest DRBD version, you need to use a cluster filesystem. I think that DRBD should write their own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments since most cluster filesystems are complex or simply have many flaws.
SK
System Administrator at Confidential
A scalable solution to create clusters, and auto-assign a master
The solution has some downsides related to the election mechanism, meaning that if the servers or the cluster services or cluster server elect one server, they will attribute to that server an object that is called a quorum. This quorum does the server or the service that has that quorum, it is taken as the master. So when you have, for example, something happens in your data centers like a power outage or an unexpected shutdown, and you can't start the master server what sometimes will happen, is since the shutdown was unexpected, the cluster didn't have time to do some post configurations before the extension of the shutdown of the servers, sometimes that quorum can't be removed from the crashed master and the cluster wants stuff. This is part of the architecture of this service, the Failover service. So sometimes we face this type of problem. In the past, we had a lot of power outages and when we started after, our server, we faced this problem. Meaning that the cluster won't stop because one of the servers, the master crashed, and they didn't want to start. So we need to access and do some line configurations so that we will force the cluster to elect a new master and ignore the crashed one.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"DRBD helped me and many customers to provide data in an HA environment with low costs (since DRBD itself is free)."
"The product is stable."
"But once it is done, it will perform very well."
"I would recommend this solution to others, we have used it for a long time and it has been reliable."
"It's scalable, highly available, and is agile to handle workloads."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The reliability is pretty good."
 

Cons

"Working with DRBD can be complex and it takes time to understand how it works."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"We are currently looking for another solution because, in many industries, such as eCommerce, they operate 24 hours a day seven days a week and this solution has some downtime which our customers do not like."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"Technical support isn't as responsive as I'd like."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
15%
Outsourcing Company
13%
University
10%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Portland State University, Porsche Informatik, Siemens, Ericsson,T-Mobile, Addidas
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale, Microsoft, Linbit and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.