Swarm64 vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Swarm64 and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Veritas and others in High Availability Clustering.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
  • "We are on an annual license to use this solution."
  • "So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
  • "I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:There is no extra charge except a service fee for some professional work. I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution uses external storage, while third-party solutions don't use external storage. They're using a mirror to create a partition on each server and synchronize the data in the background. It's… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    60
    Comparisons
    27
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,855
    Comparisons
    696
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    749
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Swarm64
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Swarm64 seamlessly combines hard- and software into an engineered solution for greater business efficiency and performance. The S64DA is the out of the box solution to add analytical power to your relational databases.
    Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
    Sample Customers
    Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor
    Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company43%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Security Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Swarm64 is ranked 8th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 8 reviews. Swarm64 is rated 0.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy". Swarm64 is most compared with , whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with IBM PowerHA System Mirror, Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD and HPE Serviceguard.

    See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

    We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.