Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics AX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in ERP
8th
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (1st)
Microsoft Dynamics AX
Ranking in ERP
4th
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.0%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 6.3%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP
 

Q&A Highlights

Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 30, 2015
 

Featured Reviews

Suresh Wickramasinghe - PeerSpot reviewer
Simplifies finance processes and is easy to use but requires a user-friendly interface
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a user-friendly ERP solution that is quite simple. It has a very straightforward interface, which allows end users, especially those with a finance background like me, to engage in finance areas such as vouchers, manual vouchers, email receipts, and GL analysis efficiently. This ERP system is easy to handle; anyone can learn it faster compared to other ERPs. For smaller companies or startups, I would recommend JD Edwards.
SherifAnter - PeerSpot reviewer
The sales and distribution modules are robust, and reliable, and seldom encounter issues
In GP, there are certain features like financial reporting that aren't part of the core GP package. Users might need to install additional components for these features. For example, there's a reseller product called Management Reporter, but many users would prefer to have the reporting capabilities integrated within GP itself, rather than relying on external tools. The manufacturing module in GP is quite basic, and those who require more advanced manufacturing capabilities often turn to third-party modules or tools. Additionally, you might be aware that in 2028, GP is expected to reach its end of life. Microsoft has already ceased selling GP to new customers. It's essentially the same product, but this marks the final year for GP's availability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a user-friendly ERP solution that is quite simple."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."
"A stable and solid product."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very scalable. It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"Flexibility is the best feature. Because we have the source code, we can develop our ideas. It enables us to develop new functions."
"AX is nearly a Tier One product, so implementations are long, but there's a lot of flexibility. Also, the ability to handle different issues found in larger organizations."
"According to user feedback, the product's most valuable features are modern web-based accessibility and user-friendly interface."
"We're using the solution for financial modules, specifically focusing on consolidation, financial configuration, management reporting for warehousing, sales. Most of the features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are good. The overall structure and functions are great. The solution is stable. The initial setup is straightforward."
"A valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it is stable."
"Dynamics AX is very simple to use."
"The tool's most valuable feature is reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the workflow of the modules."
 

Cons

"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"For large or sophisticated organizations, I would not recommend JD Edwards."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."
"There might be some features to support localizations that could be helpful to add."
"Change management could be better."
"We experienced some challenges with the mobile apps due to the insufficient processing capacity to handle the workload effectively."
"Our version has performance issues so it gets stuck and is slow."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX can improve by having a more modern user interface. It should be more modular and dynamic. Additionally, the solution could be easier to connect with APIs with other technologies."
"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."
"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."
"It is no longer supported from a security perspective, so it is not getting updated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."
"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."
"The solution’s pricing depends on the module you’re purchasing."
"There is an annual license for this solution."
"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."
"EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX is expensive."
"I purchased the license once, and there is a license with a partner that I pay for annually."
"Comparatively, Business Central appears to be more cost-effective. Microsoft offers Business Central at only $70 per user per month in the US. In contrast, GP requires an initial investment, including around $9,000 for the GP license for three users and additional expenses for hardware. Therefore, the initial investment for GP is quite substantial. On the other hand, cloud-based ERP products like Business Central do not entail the same upfront investment and operate on an ongoing, subscription-based model."
"The product's pricing is expensive. The tool costs 210 USD per user for one month."
"The platform's price offering is good."
"The price of the solution could benefit from being less expensive."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX is not expensive."
"In relation to the cloud, it might be expensive for a longer duration. However, it's essential to consider the demands of enterprise users. While it's cost-effective in the short run, it becomes relatively costly in the long run."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 30, 2015
Mar 30, 2015
Hard to help without knowing more about your specific environment, but I would concur with Kevin - if you and your users are a Microsoft shop then Dynamics will probably win out on user acceptance in this comparison. This is a recurring theme in multiple case studies we have written. You may wish to consult this white paper: http://istart.com.au/research-articles/an-expert-guide-to-selecting-an...
2 out of 10 answers
it_user132531 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 19, 2015
I can only really speak about Dynamics Ax as I have little knowledge of the Jd Edwards package. From a users point of review we have had good feedback about most of the functionality. A few issues with low resolution machines and windows sizing but anyone that uses ms office should be able to pick up Dynamics relatively easy. The most difficult part is the data setup for financial and items. I will not say Dynamics is perfect as it will require some development work in areas that should be out of the box. However, as long as you are careful with what is changed then the product should meet most requirements. Just try to look at Business process change before changing core functionality. I have seen disasters where businesses try to amend the system to fit practices that are not within the Dynamics processes. Hope this assists Kind regards Tony Bowyer
it_user209505 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 19, 2015
Any specific reason to lean towards Dynamics AX and not even considering SAP ?
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the high side.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne due to its stability and functionality, but it may be cost-prohibitive for clients who are budget-conscious. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?
Microsoft Dynamics AX has several areas that need improvement, particularly when compared to larger systems. It lacks the concept of month-end closing, which is essential for tight control over fin...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?
I primarily use Microsoft Dynamics AX ( /products/microsoft-dynamics-ax-reviews ) for the financial module, which includes the general ledger, account payable, account receivable, inventory, and pu...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.