Infobright DB vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

Ignite Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Ignite Technologies is ranked #37, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.2. Ignite Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Ignite Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

172 Views
110 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 31 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

992 Views
782 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

Oracle Database In-Memory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and Oracle Database In-Memory compete in the data processing enhancement category. Oracle Database In-Memory appears to have the upper hand with a more extensive feature set justifying its higher cost.

Features: Infobright DB uses a columnar database structure for high data compression, efficient query execution, and supports big data storage, making it apt for analytical tasks. Oracle Database In-Memory is known for its real-time analytics, scalability, and integration with Oracle products, appealing to dynamic business environments.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could enhance its advanced analytics capabilities, expand integration options, and improve customization for specific business needs. Oracle Database In-Memory may benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing resource demands, and enhancing the user interface for ease of management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infobright DB offers straightforward deployment with minimal hardware requirements, suitable for smaller infrastructures. Oracle Database In-Memory, though entailing a complex setup, provides robust customer service and integrates well within Oracle's ecosystem for enterprises planning long-term deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB is cost-effective, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, with a lower upfront cost and good ROI. Oracle Database In-Memory, despite its higher initial cost, offers value through its comprehensive features and performance, catering to enterprises seeking significant enhancements in data-processing efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (27th)

Oracle Database In-Memory

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Steve Dodge

Senior System Architect - Resiliency Engineering at AT&T

If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.

This version of Infobright has zero support for distributed scalability. The internal smart grid employed for each table has a major flaw in that the data size cannot be expunged until 2GB of data is reached at the column-level. This is a major flaw, making usage in a big-data scenario impossible. This means that you can delete as many records from a database table as you want. However, unless the 2GB aggregate size threshold was reached for some of the columns in the table, no reduction in disk space usage will occur. Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk. I spent countless hours trying to find some workaround for this. I have nightmares of my e-mail inbox full of unsolvable questions about data size reduction from our field engineers.

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Faster processing and improved memory operations have enhanced transaction and analytics efficiency

The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory ( /products/oracle-database-in-memory-reviews ) include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics. It also offers specific memory areas, like in-memory cache, that act as intermediaries between disk and buffer cache. This feature helps organizations handle real-time memory requirements effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

"The solution is very fast."

"The solution's ROI is excellent."

"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its performance optimization within our hardware environment."

"The scalability is very good."

"The most valuable feature is that Database-In-Memory is more consistent and faster than traditional databases as it requires fewer CPUs to process instructions."

"Security is the most valuable feature."

"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region."

"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The dashboard requires some refreshment or configuration improvements."

"Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management."

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."

"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."

"The product could be more economical."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

"The product is expensive."

"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

"The solution's pricing is high."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

Pricing is justified by the performance and business value offered by Oracle Database In-Memory. Although slightly higher, recent reductions in cloud costs and learning opportunities, such as free ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management. Enhancing features like CAG augmentation and cache augmentation could signif...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 26% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 15% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 13% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

April 2025

Download Infobright DB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Also Known As

Infobright

No data available

Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Ignite Technologies

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Shanghai Customs

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Free Report: Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.