We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Neustar UltraDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"DDoS protection and WAF are the most valuable features. It is easy to deploy a service. It is easy and quick to deploy to a new website."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is easy to configure."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"It is a stable solution."
"The setup of Imperva DDoS was easy."
"In the DDoS it's difficult to validate what is a genuine request from an end user. We've started being able to do that with the logistics that they have set up. With the protection that they have provided, they are able to identify what is valid and what is not valid. We see that a person who is getting DDoS Neustar service is able to block that particular user. However, while they are doing that it doesn't affect other customers on the server."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense."
Earn 20 points
Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 7 reviews while Neustar UltraDDoS is ranked 28th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Neustar UltraDDoS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "Reliable with an impressive three-second SLA and reasonable pricing". On the other hand, Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Neustar UltraDDoS is most compared with Arbor DDoS and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.