Oracle WebLogic Server and Microsoft IIS are prominent competitors in enterprise application platforms. WebLogic Server stands out for complex enterprise environments, offering strong integration with Oracle products, while IIS is favored for its seamless integration with Microsoft systems, making it ideal for smaller applications and Windows users.
Features: Oracle WebLogic Server offers a comprehensive administration console, robust clustering capabilities, and seamless integration with Oracle products, making it suitable for complex enterprise needs. IIS provides easy integration with Microsoft systems, simplicity, and a lightweight configuration, ideal for smaller applications and users in a Windows environment.
Room for Improvement: Oracle WebLogic Server could improve by offering a lighter version for microservices, addressing configuration challenges, and revising costly licensing terms. Enhancements in monitoring, diagnostics, and pricing are also desirable. IIS users seek better integration with non-Microsoft products, enhanced security features, and simpler setup procedures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle WebLogic Server, often deployed in on-premises and hybrid settings, benefits from 24/7 support but at a high cost. Its support quality varies but is generally effective. IIS, primarily on-premises with cloud capabilities, offers straightforward deployment due to its Windows integration, though its support outside Microsoft systems can be improved.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebLogic Server involves a high initial cost due to licensing based on physical cores, contributing to substantial expenses but providing strong ROI through its robust capabilities. IIS is cost-effective, included with Windows Server licenses, offering a budget-friendly choice for smaller businesses or those invested in Microsoft systems, with reasonable ROI in compatible environments.
It should be more user-friendly overall, because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
There are typically no significant issues.
I would rate the support from Microsoft very high because I definitely got all the help during the testing time of the development kit while we were configuring features on our on-premises server.
I would rate customer service and support from Oracle for this product as either nine or ten.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
I find Oracle WebLogic Server to be highly scalable, rating it as nine out of ten.
It was secured for us, as we launched the product, and people were accessing it from India and Virginia, and we had no problem.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
It should be more user-friendly because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
Using scripting allows for the creation of resources.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
We never had any pricing issue, but I don't know if it is competitive or not.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
The best features of IIS are that you can design your own website and manage it yourself, creating as many websites as you want.
It also offers cluster services, which means I can install, create clusters, and add WebLogic Servers as members.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Oracle WebLogic Server | 18.4% |
IIS | 5.9% |
Other | 75.7% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 28 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 20 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 15 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 17 |
Oracle WebLogic Server is a powerful enterprise application server renowned for hosting and managing Java-based applications. Its robust infrastructure supports seamless deployment, making it suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments.
Oracle WebLogic Server provides a comprehensive solution for enterprise Java deployments, offering strong integration capabilities with Oracle technologies and other enterprise systems. It features a versatile administration console and robust clustering that ensure high scalability, stability, and reliability. Known for its comprehensive monitoring tools, WebLogic Server ensures that applications perform optimally, while its flexibility and ease of management make it a preferred choice for many enterprises. Despite its high pricing and certain challenges like start-up times and configuration complexities, it remains a strong choice for organizations needing reliable, high-performance application hosting. Oracle's efforts to address patch management, error handling, and memory management continue to evolve, aiming to enhance overall efficiency and security.
What are the key features of Oracle WebLogic Server?Oracle WebLogic Server is predominantly deployed in industries needing robust application hosting and management, such as banking, e-commerce, insurance, and financial services. Its reliability and adaptability make it suitable for internal applications, ERP solutions, and load distribution tasks. Organizations utilize it for SOAP solutions and develop platforms both on-premises and in the cloud, benefiting from its powerful integration with Oracle Service Bus and efficient management of client-specific environments.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.