Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs Statseeker comparison

IDERA and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. IDERA is ranked #103, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. IDERA holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews
  • 340 Views
  • 224 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 613 Views
  • 546 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor compete in network monitoring. Statseeker leads in data efficiency, while IDERA stands out for extensive monitoring.

Features: Statseeker offers efficient data collection, real-time analytics, and immediate network insights. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides in-depth monitoring, visibility into physical and virtual IT environments, and a comprehensive feature suite.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its infrastructure depth, extend its feature set, and diversify analytics capabilities. IDERA could simplify deployment, reduce complexity in setup, and improve real-time data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker features a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service to aid implementation. IDERA, with more complex deployment due to expansive capabilities, provides comprehensive support for a smoother setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is known for cost-effectiveness, offering significant ROI with lower initial costs. IDERA's higher pricing reflects its robust monitoring feature set, promising valuable returns over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
103rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (70th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Statseeker0.3%
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor0.2%
Other99.5%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Nafiu Garba - PeerSpot reviewer
It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices
What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.
Read full review
JE
We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices
One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."
"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."
"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."
"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."
"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."
"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."
"It's probably $5K a year for the license."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
10%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise34
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

TruView vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Logo
TruView vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor
Compared 52% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor
Compared 48% of the time
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 39% of the time
Zabbix vs Statseeker Logo
Zabbix vs Statseeker
Compared 26% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker
Compared 18% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 17% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
September 2025
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reportDownload IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
September 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time
No data available
 

Overview

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor helps IT administrators to unify performance monitoring and optimization of IT infrastructure. Unlike its competition, it provides monitoring of a broad range of platforms and applications, ability to set service-level agreements, and support of both agent and agentless monitoring.

IDERA
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Free Report: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.