Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs Statseeker comparison

IDERA and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. IDERA is ranked #110, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. IDERA holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews
  • 144 Views
  • 98 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 416 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor compete in network monitoring. Statseeker leads in data efficiency, while IDERA stands out for extensive monitoring.

Features: Statseeker offers efficient data collection, real-time analytics, and immediate network insights. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides in-depth monitoring, visibility into physical and virtual IT environments, and a comprehensive feature suite.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its infrastructure depth, extend its feature set, and diversify analytics capabilities. IDERA could simplify deployment, reduce complexity in setup, and improve real-time data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker features a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service to aid implementation. IDERA, with more complex deployment due to expansive capabilities, provides comprehensive support for a smoother setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is known for cost-effectiveness, offering significant ROI with lower initial costs. IDERA's higher pricing reflects its robust monitoring feature set, promising valuable returns over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
110th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (77th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Nafiu Garba - PeerSpot reviewer
It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices
What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.
Read full review
JH
Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise
The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."
"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."
"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."
"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."
"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."
"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 54% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 46% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
April 2025
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reportDownload IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
April 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time
No data available
 

Overview

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor helps IT administrators to unify performance monitoring and optimization of IT infrastructure. Unlike its competition, it provides monitoring of a broad range of platforms and applications, ability to set service-level agreements, and support of both agent and agentless monitoring.

IDERA
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Free Report: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.