We performed a comparison between IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 61st in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with , whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
