We performed a comparison between IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and SolarWinds NPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"It combines and presents information from many different sources, giving a corporate-wide vision on a single pane of glass."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"It is scalable."
"It gives us a map of the network setup and one console to see the entire network."
"The most valuable features of SolarWinds NPM are network performance monitoring and the overall benefit for servers."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We deployed the solution from new and completed the upgrades."
"The stability is fantastic."
"As we look to add more servers to our virtual environment and to understand the impact, the solution allows us to dig into the historical charts related to capacity planning."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"It would be nice to have a test to check if you can access a particular device via API without installing it and waiting for a poll cycle. You should have the capacity to initiate a test to see if it was reachable and get the results almost immediately."
"The evaluation time for the product is too short especially for large corporations."
"The integration needs to be improved."
"This product could improve by adding cloud monitoring. I want SolarWinds NPM to do much more integration, and have more involvement in cloud monitoring, like AWS or Google, or Azure. I feel like it requires lots of improvement for cloud monitoring in NPM."
"Technical support and releases are not particularly reliable."
"The tool can only monitor up to 1000 instances in a single SolarWinds console. Customers may have over 1000 instances. Hence, it needs to support a minimum of 1500 instances. It should also improve support."
"It is difficult for stakeholders to translate technical requirements, which results in difficulties selecting a platform or implementing a solution."
"One of the challenges with SolarWinds is that in order to pull the data, we have to have a lot of false positives."
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 50th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 147 reviews. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and LogicMonitor.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.