Icinga vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Icinga and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #40, while OpenText is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Icinga holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

6,933 Views
5,200 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

1,638 Views
1,278 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Icinga

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Icinga and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network management solutions category. Icinga has the upper hand in terms of pricing and support while OpenText is ahead with a comprehensive feature set.

Features: Icinga offers a modular architecture for scalability, high customization options, and extensive integrations. OpenText Network Operations Management includes performance monitoring, advanced automation features, and a wide range of built-in functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could enhance its built-in functionalities, reduce its reliance on external integrations, and improve some automation features. OpenText Network Operations Management can work on simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial costs, and offering more flexible pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga has a simple deployment process with minimal configuration, ideal for IT teams with limited resources, and offers responsive customer support. OpenText provides a complex deployment process due to its extensive capabilities but ensures smooth operation with robust professional support.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga offers low setup costs and significant ROI when leveraging its open-source nature and community support. OpenText requires higher upfront costs but provides substantial ROI through enhanced operational efficiencies and a comprehensive feature set, making it a worthwhile investment for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (47th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st)

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.2%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Icinga	1.2%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"I use it for monitoring infrastructure and it was very good for that issue."

More Icinga pros

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

Cons

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

More Icinga cons

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is cheap."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is free to use."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Construction Company

25%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 18% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

June 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

June 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

June 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.