ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ManageEngine and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

8,974 Views
8,615 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

2,501 Views
1,876 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network monitoring solutions space. ManageEngine OpManager has an edge due to its pricing structure and efficient customer support, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management leads with its advanced feature set and comprehensive capabilities.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager provides robust network performance monitoring, fault management, and detailed reporting to ensure effective network operation. OpenText Network Operations Management is equipped with extensive network management capabilities, advanced automation features, and flexible integration options, which are beneficial for large-scale enterprises managing complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its automation capabilities, integrate more advanced analytics tools, and streamline its user interface for improved efficiency. OpenText Network Operations Management could improve by reducing complexity during setup, offering more competitive pricing, and simplifying user navigation to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support that minimizes downtime during implementation. OpenText Network Operations Management, while featuring more complex setup due to its extensive capabilities, provides structured support channels to assist deployment, which might require a longer integration period.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is noted for providing cost-effective solutions with quick ROI, attributed to its affordable pricing model. In contrast, OpenText Network Operations Management is positioned at a higher price point but delivers substantial ROI justified by its sophisticated features and scalability. ManageEngine, known for being budget-friendly, is suitable for small to mid-sized enterprises, whereas OpenText is optimal for larger enterprises seeking advanced functionality despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.4%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.4%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ashutosh Jha

Project engineer at IT Solution india private limited

Centralized monitoring has highlighted limited device control but has improved proactive actions

I have configured adaptive thresholds on servers while using ManageEngine OpManager. If there is high CPU utilization or storage usage, the system will notify me or reset the system or reset the services. ManageEngine OpManager has multiple features that are valuable to our organization. We have integrated our firewall into ManageEngine OpManager, and it provides us notifications for firewall issues as well. ManageEngine OpManager provides an adaptive threshold feature that is very effective. The alerts and the ability to restart services or computers or end devices in ManageEngine OpManager are what I find most valuable. If we have set performance monitoring adaptive thresholds and they exceed the configured value, the system will take action automatically. We can also integrate our switches and access points and control them from ManageEngine OpManager.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."

"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."

"Alerting is the biggest asset as we can have real-time failure view and predict failures in some cases."

"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"We monitor customer networks with it and the performance is extremely good."

"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts, as the administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately, and this is the feature we value and use the most."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

Cons

"One challenge in ManageEngine OpManager is that improvements are needed because a customer using the solution has Check Point firewall and needs to monitor their VPN tunnels, but there is no option currently available for that."

"The pricing of the solution is high."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view; when I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface and get confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint."

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive."

"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."

"The support for this solution needs to be improved significantly, to the point where we will no longer be using some of the available products because we cannot get the required support for them."

"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The product is not worth the money."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 7% of the time

FireMon Asset Manager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

October 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

October 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

OpManager

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

November 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.