ITRS Geneos vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #44, while ITRS is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,834 Views
5,719 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 58 ITRS Geneos reviews

9,166 Views
3,850 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Icinga

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Icinga are key players in monitoring solutions. Icinga seems to have the upper hand in pricing and flexibility due to its open-source nature.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers robust real-time monitoring, adaptability, and a comprehensive feature set. Icinga provides competitive pricing, a wide range of plugins, and the flexibility of being open-source.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos is considered expensive and may require pricing negotiation; there's a perception of high costs. Icinga may have indirect costs related to customization and maintenance, and lacks some premium features found in enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos offers strong support, crucial for regulated industries like finance, ensuring seamless deployment and reliable service. Icinga benefits from a large community, aiding in open-source deployment with the ability for peer support but may lack structured customer service compared to premium offerings.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is costly but users find value in the return on investment due to its extensive feature set that helps reduce severe incidents. Icinga’s pricing is more budget-friendly with its largely free nature, appealing for cost-effective implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

50th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ITRS Geneos	0.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Ravi ShankarSundarasan

Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder

Real-time monitoring has improved incident response and supports proactive anomaly detection

The advantages and strong points of ITRS Geneos for me personally are seamless integration with existing systems as well as upcoming modern systems. The user interface is really good. From a management point of view, these are the key aspects with respect to the user interface and seamless integration. We get very good community support for this product. ITRS Geneos has impacted my organization positively, and I would rate it 4.5 out of 5.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

More Icinga pros

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"ITRS Geneos provides peace of mind by mentoring our processes and applications."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"Real-time monitoring of market data components on an enterprise environment is the most valuable feature of Active Console and Gateway."

"It has helped us re-define the Monitoring operating model which in turn has made support teams more efficient by using features like commented snoozing on various levels, use of knowledgebase articles associated with each alert cell, metric logging for capacity monitoring etc."

"Customer Service: Very good. Technical Support: Very good."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"It's a very effective and productive tool, and avoids any major incidents."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"The connection between Icinga and Icinga Web."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"Sometimes, it is very hard to keep an overview of what's happening."

More Icinga cons

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app."

"In some cases Netprobe can be unstable."

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"The Geneos configuration has greatly improved since the nascent version 1.0 days, but still requires specialist knowledge and convoluted config debugging when something’s not monitoring as expected."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

"I had issues scaling it and ended up having to distribute the load over seven gateways."

"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open-source solution."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The solution is free to use."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"The solution is cheap."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

12%

Financial Services Firm

47%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

I do not have the pricing information because it lies with the finance team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

I do not see much room for improvement. Support for data cloud platforms could be great. Modern cloud platforms and data cloud platforms require more attention from the product.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

I was using ITRS Geneos at HSBC. I have been using this product for more than two years. I have 20 years of experience working in IT with software in general. I am working with an on-premises deplo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 4% of the time

Nmap vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

September 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

September 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Geneos

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

ITRS Geneos offers a customizable platform for real-time monitoring with minimal system impact, facilitating insights across multiple platforms. Known for its scalability, it efficiently integrates with other tools, supporting industries with its proactive monitoring capabilities.

ITRS Geneos allows users to effectively manage financial services infrastructure by monitoring trading systems, treasury management, and FX operations. It provides real-time dashboards to track server uptime, application performance, and health metrics. Users benefit from its enterprise-wide data aggregation, alerting features, and script adaptability while needing improvement in cloud monitoring and AI-based predictive functionalities. The tool's setup requires some expertise, suggesting a need for more intuitive solutions.

What are the most important features of ITRS Geneos?

Customizable Dashboards: Enables real-time analytics across platforms.
Lightweight Netprobe: Facilitates efficient data aggregation with minimal impact.
Plugin Support: Ensures extensive compatibility and integration.
Proactive Monitoring: Allows for early issue detection and resolution.
Script Adaptability: Supports tailored solutions for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Minimized Manual Intervention: Automation features reduce manual tasks.
Scalability: Easily accommodates growing enterprise needs.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with existing tools.
Insightful Dashboards: Provides actionable metrics for decision making.

ITRS Geneos is prominently utilized in financial sectors. Banks and financial institutions leverage its capabilities to monitor infrastructure and application performance, optimizing trading systems and FX operations. It builds comprehensive dashboards, offering valuable insights into server health, application logs, and network performance, contributing significantly to operational efficiency.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

September 2026

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.