IBM Watson Explorer vs Weka comparison

IBM and Weka are both solutions in the Data Mining category. IBM is ranked #12, while Weka is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in DM, compared to Weka’s 17.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Weka users who would recommend it.

IBM Watson Explorer

Read 10 IBM Watson Explorer reviews

513 Views
62 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Weka

Read 14 Weka reviews

1,797 Views
1,671 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

IBM Watson Explorer

Weka

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Weka and IBM Watson Explorer are competing in data analysis and AI technologies. Data comparisons show IBM Watson Explorer is often preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features:Weka integrates diverse machine learning algorithms and provides robust data preprocessing tools. Its user-friendly interface and open-source flexibility make it ideal for academic use. IBM Watson Explorer excels in text analytics, cognitive computing, and versatile functionality for enterprise solutions.

Room for Improvement:Weka could enhance its visualization capabilities and support for large data volumes. Its deployment options might lack scalability for bigger enterprises. More user support resources could be beneficial. IBM Watson Explorer might improve in user interface complexity and resource requirements. Enhancements in integration options and a more straightforward setup could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Weka offers a straightforward deployment suitable for smaller projects with a simple setup. IBM Watson Explorer requires a more complex enterprise-level deployment but has robust customer support and comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI:Weka's open-source model provides lower setup costs, appealing to cost-sensitive projects, delivering good ROI through its flexibility. IBM Watson Explorer comes with higher setup costs, justified by its advanced capabilities and substantial ROI for enterprises able to invest in its extended features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Watson Explorer

Ranking in Data Mining

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Weka

Ranking in Data Mining

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Mining category, the mindshare of IBM Watson Explorer is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Weka is 17.8%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Mining

Featured Reviews

it_user1319820

Lead Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

A data analysis tool that is scalable and includes keyword search functionality

The solution is used for a government company for data collection and analysis I have found the auto-generated document very useful as well as the main keywords that are highlighted, which are used for the search functionality within IBM Watson Explorer. I have been using the solution for five…

Read full review

AwaisAnwar

Treasury Management in Finance Department at National University of Pakistan

Open source, good for basic data mining use cases except for the visualization results

I haven't found it particularly useful. It lacks state-of-the-art algorithms and impressive outcomes. While it might offer insights for basic warehouse tasks, it falls short of deeper understanding and results. Moreover, a new user interface would be great, especially for beginners. Something that guides them through the available tools and helps them achieve their goals. I haven't seen anything like that myself, though maybe it's there and I missed it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of use is pretty good as is the standardization of not actually having to have my own natural learning algorithms, just to use the Watson APIs."

"The valuable feature of Watson Explorer for us is data entities, and to see the hidden insights from within unstructured data."

"For me, as a user, the most valuable feature is the ability to ingest and then retrieve information from a range of separate sources; the ability to dissect questions in context and actually answer them."

"The ability to easily pull together lots of different pieces of information and drill down in a smarter way than has been possible with other analytics tools is key. Watson is all based on a set of AI and deep learning, machine-learning capabilities, and it is looking behind the scenes at some relationships that you likely would not have spotted on your own. It's pulling things together, categorizing some things, that are not something that you might have seen on your own."

"I have found the auto-generated document very useful as well as the main keywords that are highlighted, which are used for the search functionality within IBM Watson Explorer."

"We take natural language that was happening in our repositories and our application and then feed it to the Watson APIs. We receive JSON payloads as an API response to get cognitive feedback from the repository data."

"The interface is very good, and the algorithms are the very best."

"In Weka, anyone can access the program without being a programmer, which is a good feature since the entry cost is very low."

"With clustering, if it's a yes, it's a yes, if it's a no, it's a no. It gives you a 100% level of accuracy of a model that has been trained, and that is in most cases, usually misleading. Classification is highly valuable when done as opposed to clustering."

"I like the machine algorithm for clustering systems. Weka has larger capabilities. There are multiple algorithms that can be used for clustering. It depends upon the user requirements. For clustering, I've used DBSCAN, whereas for supervised learning, I've used AVM and RFT."

"Weka is a very nice tool, it needs very small requirements. If I want to implement something in Python, I need a lot of memory and space but Weka is very lightweight. Anyone can implement any kind of algorithm, and we can show the results immediately to the client using the one-page feature. The client always wants to know the story. They want the result."

"The path of machine learning in classification and clustering is useful. The GUI can get you results. No programming is needed. No need to write down your script first or send to your model or input your data."

"It is a stable product."

"Weka's best features are its user-friendly graphic interface interpretation of data sets and the ease of analyzing data."

More Weka pros

Cons

"Stability is actually one of the areas that could use improvement. Setting it up is always tough. Setting Explorer requires experts, but also the underlying platform is not that stable. So it really needs a good expert to keep it running."

"The solution is expensive."

"More cognitive feedback would be good. The natural language analysis is great, the sentiment analyzers are great. But I would just like to see more... innovation done with the Watson platform."

"It is a little bit tricky to get used to the workflow of knowing how to train Watson, what can be provided, what can't be, how to provide it, how to import, export, and what it means every time you have to add a new dictionary"

"It needs better language support, to include some other languages. Also, they should improve the user interface."

"Much of IBM operates this way, where they have sets of tools that are in the middleware space, and it becomes the customer's responsibility or the business partner's responsibility to develop full solutions that take advantage of that middleware. I think IBM's finding itself in that spot with Watson-related technologies as well, where the capabilities to do really interesting and useful things for customers is there, but somebody still has to build it. Is that going to be the customer? Are they going to be willing to take on that responsibility themselves"

"I would say, give some kind of a community edition, a free edition. A lot of companies do, even Amazon gives you some kind of trial and error opportunities. If they could provide something like that, it would be good."

"Small businesses will probably have a little harder time getting into it, just because of the amount of resources that they have available, both financial and time, but it really is a solution that should work for them."

"The product is good, but I would like it to work with big data. I know it has a Spark integration they could use to do analysis in clusters, but it's not so clear how to use it."

"The filter section lacks some specific transformation tools. If you want to change a variable from a numeric variable to a categorical variable, you don't have a feature that can enable you to change a variable from a numeric variable to a categorical variable."

"Not particularly user friendly."

"If you have one missing value in your dataset and this missing value belongs to a specific attribute and the attribute is a numeric attribute and there is only one missing data, whenever you import this data, the problem is that Weka cannot understand that this is a numeric field. It converts everything into a string, and there is no way to convert the string into numerical math. It's really very complicated."

"Weka could be more stable."

"While it might offer insights for basic warehouse tasks, it falls short of deeper understanding and results."

"If there are a lot more lines of code, then we should use another language."

"I believe is there are a few newer algorithms that are not present in the Weka libraries. Whereas, for example, if I want to have a solution that involves deep learning, so I don't think that Weka has that capability. So in that case I have to use Python for ... predict any algorithms based on deep learning."

More Weka cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"We use the free version now. My faculty is very small."

"The solution is free and open-source."

"As far as I know, Weka is a freeware tool, and I am not aware if they have an online solution or if it is a commercial product."

"Currently, I am using an open-source version so I don't know much about the price of this solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Mining solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

15%

Performing Arts

12%

University

10%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

University

18%

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Weka?

It is a stable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Weka?

Weka is free and open-source software. That is why I used it over KNIME.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Weka?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Watson Explorer

Compared 33% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs IBM Watson Explorer

Compared 28% of the time

Salesforce Einstein Analytics vs IBM Watson Explorer

Compared 25% of the time

Izenda vs IBM Watson Explorer

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM Watson Explorer Competitors

KNIME Business Hub vs Weka

Compared 57% of the time

IBM SPSS Statistics vs Weka

Compared 14% of the time

IBM SPSS Modeler vs Weka

Compared 9% of the time

SAS Analytics vs Weka

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Weka

Compared 5% of the time

More Weka Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Watson Explorer

August 2025

Download IBM Watson Explorer product report

Buyer's Guide

Weka

July 2025

Download Weka product report

Also Known As

IBM WEX

No data available

Overview

IBM Watson Explorer is a cognitive exploration and content analysis platform that lets you listen to your data for advice. Explore and analyze structured, unstructured, internal, external and public content to uncover trends and patterns that improve decision-making, customer service and ROI. Leverage built-in cognitive capabilities powered by machine learning models, natural language processing and next-generation APIs to unlock hidden value in all your data. Gain a secure 360-degree view of customers, in context, to deliver better experiences for your clients.

IBM

Weka is a collection of machine learning algorithms for data mining tasks. The algorithms can either be applied directly to a dataset or called from your own Java code. Weka contains tools for data pre-processing, classification, regression, clustering, association rules, and visualization. It is also well-suited for developing new machine learning schemes.

Weka

Sample Customers

RIMAC, Westpac New Zealand, Toyota Financial Services, Swiss Re, Akershus University Hospital, Korean Air Lines, Mizuho Bank, Honda

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Watson Explorer vs. Weka report.

See our list of best Data Mining vendors.

We monitor all Data Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.