IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

IBM and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #61, while SolarWinds is ranked #59. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

538 Views
276 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

598 Views
304 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and SolarWinds Pingdom are two leading tools for application performance management and monitoring. SolarWinds Pingdom is often favored for its intuitive design and ease of use, whereas IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager excels in robust feature sets and comprehensive support.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to SolarWinds Pingdom?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers extensive monitoring capabilities, deep integration with IBM products, and detailed performance analytics. SolarWinds Pingdom provides straightforward monitoring solutions, real-time performance alerts, and easy configuration for quick insights.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to SolarWinds Pingdom?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager could improve user accessibility, reduce the learning curve, and make the platform more approachable for new users. SolarWinds Pingdom could enhance advanced analytics, deepen integration abilities, and provide more detailed insights.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to SolarWinds Pingdom?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager features thorough documentation and support but has a time-consuming, technically demanding deployment process. SolarWinds Pingdom enjoys quick deployment, a cloud-based model, and accessible customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to SolarWinds Pingdom?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager requires higher upfront investment and ongoing costs, justified by its extensive capabilities and significant ROI over time. SolarWinds Pingdom offers a more affordable pricing model, faster ROI due to quick setup, and immediate insights.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

59th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

Cons

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 36% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 19% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 29% of the time

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 24% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 19% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 13% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

No data available

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

June 2025

Free Report: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.