Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

IBM and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.0, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews
  • 565 Views
  • 334 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Splunk AppDynamics
Read 246 Splunk AppDynamics reviews
  • 13,704 Views
  • 8,634 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Splunk AppDynamics are competing products in the application performance management space. IBM has an advantage in enterprise-level integration capabilities, while Splunk AppDynamics is superior in real-time data analytics, providing critical insights for optimizing application performance.

Features: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is known for robust monitoring capabilities suited for large-scale operations, infrastructure automation, and extensive enterprise-level integration. Splunk AppDynamics offers real-time application monitoring, intuitive performance analytics, and advanced data-driven insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tivoli's deployment process is complex, often beneficial for large enterprises needing custom solutions. In contrast, Splunk AppDynamics provides a straightforward installation process, enabling quicker time-to-value alongside excellent support services.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager requires a significant upfront investment due to its complex structure, which may delay ROI but offers long-term enterprise benefits. Splunk AppDynamics features competitive pricing, reflecting its value-oriented approach, delivering faster ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
55th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
246
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.8%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

CC
Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.
Read full review
Muhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic mapping enhances workflows that are user-friendly
One aspect that requires improvement is the agent. Without an agent, gathering sufficient information on applications is challenging. Additionally, the agent sometimes creates performance issues in production environments. If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems. Moving to an agentless solution, like what some competitors are doing, would be beneficial.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"What I like most about AppDynamics Server Monitoring is that it's easy to manipulate and easy to implement. All solutions have the same features, but what sets AppDynamics Server Monitoring apart is that it's really quick to implement. AppDynamics Server Monitoring has a great interface. As a developer, it doesn't matter whether it's SolarWinds, Dynatrace, or any APM you're using, but it would matter to the customer. A product must be easy to manipulate or use, for example, AppDynamics Server Monitoring, for the customer, but for developers like my team, there's no pressure, even if a solution requires coding."
"It provides a lot of data, so it helps businesses identify their user base."
"Knowing which tables on the database were working the most was valuable. It helped the client understand where they need to focus. They streamlined a lot of their queries and brought the resource usage down. It helped them to find long-running queries. They rewrote them completely so that they don't take as long and the application performs better."
"It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"I like Business iQ the most, so far. It has great analytics configurations and I can get real-time updates. We have eCommerce releases every week. So the one use case that I use Business iQ is to compare before and after release performance using AppDynamics."
"The best features of AppDynamics would be the code application monitoring capabilities."
"We are able to correlate performance between tiers."
"This solution not only provides answers but also provides sensor data. This allows us to quickly resolve issues that developers may take a long time to solve."
More Splunk AppDynamics pros
 

Cons

"The user interface was not good."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"It is stable, but the only downside is the licensing part."
"I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications."
"The UI could use a little help."
"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"The solution could improve by covering more technologies. For example, it does support .NET Core applications. However, it could be a bit better."
"The solution's pricing could be improved and made more competitive."
"The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see."
"The application end of AppDynamics Database Monitoring needs to improve by checking which applications consume licenses."
More Splunk AppDynamics cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."
"Take into consideration what you get for specific pricing models and how much it costs to add on things you may need later.​"
"The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."
"My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."
"The pricing is very competitive."
"As a technical person, and as an application development team, they all understand that this is the right tool for us. But when it comes to budget and financial matters, it takes days and weeks to convince upper management to buy this tool. So they should do something more on licensing costs."
"We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."
"The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate."
"AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."
More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
41%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
48%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
I would rate IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager a six out of ten. The monitoring tool we currently use is outdated and lacks essential features for monitoring customer experience. We face lim...
See all answers
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
See all answers
What do you like most about AppDynamics?
The solution saves time and cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 29% of the time
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 20% of the time
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 18% of the time
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 17% of the time
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 10% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 7% of the time
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 5% of the time
More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reportDownload IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Splunk AppDynamics reportDownload Splunk AppDynamics product report
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager
No data available
 

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.
IBM

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?
  • Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
  • Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
  • JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
  • Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
  • Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.
How does AppDynamics benefit users?
  • Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
  • Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
  • Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Free Report: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.