IBM DevOps Test UI vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

IBM and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #27, while SmartBear is ranked #25. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

889 Views
729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,959 Views
764 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM DevOps Test UI and ReadyAPI Test compete in software testing. IBM DevOps Test UI excels in deployment and ROI, while ReadyAPI Test is noted for its superior features.

Features: IBM DevOps Test UI integrates well with enterprise systems, supports object recognition and descriptive programming, and has a robust object identification mechanism. ReadyAPI Test excels in API testing, offers customizable test environments, and supports SOAP, REST, and JDBC, providing flexibility in testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: IBM DevOps Test UI could enhance its user interface simplicity, improve support for newer languages, and expand third-party integration support. ReadyAPI Test could benefit from simplifying its configuration, reducing resource demands for complex setups, and enhancing documentation for non-expert users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DevOps Test UI is praised for a seamless deployment process and extensive support options, allowing quick setup. ReadyAPI Test, while providing good customer service, may require more intricate deployment due to its comprehensive features, requiring a more complex initial configuration.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DevOps Test UI is competitively priced with a lower initial cost, facilitating quicker ROI. ReadyAPI Test, despite higher initial investment, offers substantial returns with advanced features and long-term benefits, justifying its cost for businesses needing extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,637 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

27th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ReadyAPI Test	1.9%
IBM DevOps Test UI	1.5%
Other	96.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"The solution has some good scanning features."

"The solution scales well."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

"Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

"Automation features are not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"The cost is not that bad."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 17% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 9% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 3% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

February 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Edumate

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

January 2026

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.