ACL Analytics vs IBM OpenPages comparison

Diligent and IBM are both solutions in the GRC category. Diligent is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Diligent holds a 3.3% mindshare in G, compared to IBM’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Diligent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ACL Analytics

Read 11 ACL Analytics reviews

2,005 Views
352 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM OpenPages

Read 8 IBM OpenPages reviews

1,220 Views
605 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

ACL Analytics

IBM OpenPages

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

IBM OpenPages and ACL Analytics are competitors in the governance, risk, and compliance market. While IBM OpenPages provides a strong framework for risk management, ACL Analytics holds the upper hand in data-driven insights and intuitive workflows.

Features: IBM OpenPages offers advanced risk analytics, extensive compliance capabilities, and robust reporting functions. ACL Analytics excels in data analytics, process automation, and integrating multiple data sources for a seamless experience.

Room for Improvement: IBM OpenPages could improve with a more user-friendly interface and streamlined deployment process. Enhancements in AI capabilities and reducing resource intensity would also benefit users. ACL Analytics would gain from enhancing its user interface and offering more out-of-the-box templates. Additional training resources and improved customization options could further augment user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM OpenPages requires substantial planning and infrastructure support for implementation, but its customer service is highly responsive. ACL Analytics's cloud-based deployment model provides a quicker setup, with prompt and effective assistance from its support team.

Pricing and ROI: IBM OpenPages involves higher initial costs due to its comprehensive features but offers significant ROI through its extensive risk management functions. ACL Analytics's competitive pricing and flexible subscription model enable quicker ROI, appealing to organizations focused on cost-effectiveness and timely returns.

To learn more, read our detailed ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (1st)

IBM OpenPages

Ranking in GRC

6th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 3.3%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 5.6%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

John Erian

Team leader - Internal Audit sector at HD Bank

Identifyies fraud efficiently through automated report analysis

I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use. I want to see more robotic reports generated automatically, rather than relying heavily on scripting. It would also be beneficial if ACL Analytics included features similar to Tableau for data presentation.

Read full review

Badri Anand Santhanam

Senior Risk Advisory Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Enhancing enterprise risk management and reporting capabilities with insightful dashboards and automated features.

IBM OpenPages offers strong reporting capabilities with Cognos integration, providing standard tabular reports, various charts, and powerful dashboards for different lines of defense. It caters to the first line managing risks and controls, the second line of SMEs providing oversight, and the independent audit function with an internal audit management module. The solution is more intuitive and task-based, allowing better involvement of the risk function across different lines of defense. The automated features translate into reporting capabilities, and data can be easily extracted and downloaded in different formats.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I did not have any problems with the stability of ACL Analytics."

"Initial setup is straightforward."

"ACL Analytics is a great application that helps me analyze data more effectively compared to other tools like Excel."

"It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."

"I recommend ACL Analytics because it makes work easier and is user-friendly."

"I rate ACL Analytics nine out of ten."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."

"The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."

More ACL Analytics pros

"Everything about IBM OpenPages is valuable, particularly when compared to other solutions in the market like MetricStream, from which we switched due to its feasibility, user-friendliness, and performance."

"IBM OpenPages saves time in my work as a developer."

"IBM OpenPages provides time savings in recording risk management components."

"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."

"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."

"The most valuable features are the workflow engine, calculations, and security rules."

Cons

"A person must have someone teach them how to use ACL Analytics as a common person cannot use it independently."

"The product's pricing has increased over the years."

"The ease of use could be better."

"The visualization capabilities in ACL Analytics need more variety and features."

"I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use."

"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."

"The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses were available. This made it very difficult for us to manage the cost, especially given the economic challenges in our country."

"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."

More ACL Analytics cons

"IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors."

"IBM needs to work on pricing for organizations with around 100 users, as the licensing model is not competitive enough for SMEs."

"Some self-relationships are not available in OpenPages' relationship model."

"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."

"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."

"It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for me as an individual seems a lot. For our organization, the price is okay. It's about $6,000 a year. I don't know of any additional costs."

"The price of $5,000 is high, and transferring money from one country to another, particularly in dollars, is challenging due to high exchange rates. Although we managed to purchase it then, the lack of a single license option and the high cost were issues."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?

The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACL Analytics?

I would rate the pricing of ACL Analytics as a 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?

We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it. Every time you enter...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM OpenPages?

The product’s interface is very intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors. Additionally, although there are risk assessment tools, I do n...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

I primarily use IBM OpenPages ( /products/ibm-openpages-reviews ) for compliance and audit programs.

See all answers

Comparisons

CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor vs ACL Analytics

Compared 35% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs ACL Analytics

Compared 24% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ACL Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs ACL Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

RSA Archer vs ACL Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

More ACL Analytics Competitors

RSA Archer vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 42% of the time

MetricStream vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 25% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 11% of the time

AuditBoard vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 6% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics

June 2025

Download ACL Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

June 2025

Download IBM OpenPages product report

Also Known As

ACL

OpenPages

Overview

ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

Diligent

Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

IBM

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance

Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages

June 2025

Free Report: ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages

Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACL Analytics vs. IBM OpenPages report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.