We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn."
"The most valuable features of the IBM Integration Bus are the flexibility to easily integrate with other solutions, such as SAP or any other vendors."
"IBM Integration Bus' most valuable features are its performance, fast and easy development, and easy support."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats."
"We use IBM Integration Bus for document conversions."
"I recommend it for large enterprises but only for specific use cases. You need to have a relatively mature integration practice in your organization to leverage its capabilities fully."
"The most valuable feature is that it's robust and its time to market is very short."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"We have to stop the integration server to start the debugging process."
"I don't mind the pricing."
"I would like to be able to build an Integration Bus cluster that is active-active."
"Session management can sometimes hand forcing server reboots."
"The memory footprint should be minimized."
"I can't say that there is any improvement I’m looking for. I’m new and haven’t connected with all features. For all drawbacks that were in the old version, I think they have been solved. The scalability needs improvement."
"Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed."
"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.