"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"It's a very good solution."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
More OpenText Content Suite Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM FileNet is ranked 5th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while OpenText Content Suite Platform is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 7.0, while OpenText Content Suite Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Useful workflow, beneficial content, but setup could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Suite Platform writes "Scalable, verifies complex solutions, and the support we receive is good". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, IBM ECM, Box and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Content Suite Platform is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, Box and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
