IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud and Data Center Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The interface is good and very user-friendly."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Security Pros →

"What I like most about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is how user-friendly it is for development. It is much simpler to work with compared to similar tools I've used.""Many different playbooks are available and can be customized.""I have no complaints about Cortex's stability.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work.""The most valuable feature is automation.""The product’s stability is good.""I have found the solution very useful, it integrates well with other platforms.""It is a scalable solution."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros →

Cons
"Lacks sufficient technical support."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Security Cons →

"The dashboard could be better.""Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR lacks to offer SIEM functionalities currently.""The solution's technical support could be better.""XSOAR could have more integration options.""I would like to see Cortex become less dependent on Active Directory and group policies to manage the deployment. Maybe I need to update my understanding of how to deploy it, but that's the way I know how to use it.""It is been decommissioned by Palo Alto.""The solution is very expensive.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
  • "From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
  • "There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
  • "It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses."
  • "When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
  • "The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is expensive."
  • "The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is comparable to other solutions in the market."
  • "The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The interface is good and very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The pricing is reasonable and it's a lot easier to make the calculation than it used to be. Of course the cost increases with the size of the infrastructure. Licensing is on an annual basis and is… more »
    Top Answer:Some of our customers would like to have more technical support from the vendor.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its capability to automate responses and collect information for any security event before you even delve into the details It's a vast product with an active roadmap, so… more »
    Top Answer:It's expensive, but the value it offers makes it worthwhile.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster.
    Ranking
    Views
    29
    Comparisons
    17
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    11,580
    Comparisons
    6,392
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Pak for Security is comprised of containerized software pre-integrated with Red Hat OpenShift. The platform connects to your existing security tools – and through the use of open standards – allows you to search for threat indicators across your hybrid, multicloud environment.

    Palo Alto Networks delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a piece of Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response software that redefines what it means for a program to orchestrate security in an automated manner. It is a next-generation solution that offers all of the features of dozens of siloed security operations center tools in one place. Cortex XSOAR combines case management, automation, real-time collaboration, and threat intelligence management to create a platform that can handle all aspects of system security. Teams that make use of Cortex XSOAR can expect to cut the number of issues that they will have to deal with by 75%. At the same time, the speed at which they resolve those issues that slip through will rise by 90%.

    Cortex XSOAR ensures that all of the IT and security tools that you employ function as a unified system. It does this by employing hundreds of integrations that allow you to run a wide variety of programs at once without ever worrying about them interfering with each other. These integrations are limited only by your imagination. They can be used immediately as they are, if that is what you need. However, they can also be customized according to the requirements of your system. This approach provides you with the maximum levels of both flexibility and utility.

    The model that this platform uses is based on a machine learning algorithm. The level of automation allows you to provide more than an unchanging and inflexible blanket of coverage. Cortex XSOAR takes all of the data that it gathers and uses it to expand its protective capabilities. This creates recommendations that you can use to create a threat playbook that can be deployed uniformly throughout your organization.


    Benefits of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

    Some of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s benefits include:

    • The ability to have all of your data collected in a single location. Valuable time can be saved now that everything that security analysts need to know in order to diagnose and react to threats has been centralized.
    • Security operations center tasks can be automated. This allows you to assign management and analyst staff to the most essential tasks. The effectiveness of your organization will be increased, which will result in a rise in your company’s overall security and productivity.
    • Many kinds of data can be stitched together by this platform. Network, endpoint, cloud, and identity data can be combined to offer a more complete picture of the threats that are discovered.
    • Integrated threat intelligence management can notify you about threats in real time. Now you can diagnose and address issues as they arise. You can also assign values to the threats so that your resources are being used in the most effective manner possible.


    Reviews from Real Users

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s centralized monitoring interface and automation are two features that help it stand out. This might help explain why one quarter of the Fortune 500 companies choose Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR over the competition.

    Peerspot users note the effectiveness of these features. One user wrote, “We were looking for a single pane of glass type of solution that would allow us to physically be in one appliance - be able to work in concert with other servers that we have within our environment. We wanted orchestration and automation. The single pane of glass was the most important part.” Another noted, "The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Retailer14%
    Government14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Educational Organization11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise47%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud and Data Center Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 20th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Resilient and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel and Swimlane.

    We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.