Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs IBM Resilient comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs. IBM Resilient report (Updated: September 2022).
633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The interface is good and very user-friendly."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Security Pros →

"It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use.""This is a good solution that we recommend for customers.""The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."

More IBM Resilient Pros →

Cons
"Lacks sufficient technical support."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Security Cons →

"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility.""The product needs a bit more development.""The initial setup is complex."

More IBM Resilient Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is very expensive."
  • "There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
  • More IBM Resilient Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The interface is good and very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The pricing is reasonable and it's a lot easier to make the calculation than it used to be. Of course the cost increases with the size of the infrastructure. Licensing is on an annual basis and is… more »
    Top Answer:Some of our customers would like to have more technical support from the vendor.
    Top Answer:The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
    Top Answer:The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    483
    Comparisons
    245
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,490
    Comparisons
    2,418
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Pak for Security is comprised of containerized software pre-integrated with Red Hat OpenShift. The platform connects to your existing security tools – and through the use of open standards – allows you to search for threat indicators across your hybrid, multicloud environment.

    The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

    The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Cloud Pak for Security
    Learn more about IBM Resilient
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Government11%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Splunk, Exabeam and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: September 2022.
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 19th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review while IBM Resilient is ranked 6th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with Splunk Phantom and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Cisco SecureX.

    See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

    We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.