• Home
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. LizardFS

IBM Cloud Object Storage vs LizardFS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Read 7 IBM Cloud Object Storage reviews
1,933 views|1,212 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
LizardFS Logo
LizardFS
Read 2 LizardFS reviews
487 views|355 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Object Storage and LizardFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Highly scalable and durable, offers reliable and cost-effective solutions for businesses managing large amounts of...
I used the trainings and roadmaps offered by IBM MOPP to master the basics. started with the installation master node the Accesser and Slicestores... Read more →
Anonymous User
There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in...
We have been running LizardFS for a while now, but only inside a testing environment. It will be deployed to production soon and it will help to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is not cheap."
  • "You have the option of a monthly or yearly license. Most customers choose the monthly option. I understand what you would like to say. IBM also lets you choose among four types of Cloud Object Storage. The difference is usage, performance, etc. Of course, high-performance storage is more expensive, while low-performance storage is for cold data, and it's really cheap."
  • "IBM Cloud is cheaper than AWS. If you want to scale your cloud infrastructure, it can be bought at almost the same price."
  • "Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft."

    • More IBM Cloud Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM Cloud Object Storage?
    Top Answer:The integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Object ...
    Top Answer:Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft. I don't believe it's… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Object Storage?
    Top Answer:All cloud environments have been pretty robust over the last few years. Of course, there's always room for improvement. If I had to choose one area, it would be making the consoles more intuitive… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 51 in File and Object Storage
    Views
    1,933
    Comparisons
    1,212
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    881
    Rating
    8.8
    19th
    out of 37 in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Views
    487
    Comparisons
    355
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cleversafe
    Learn More
    IBM
    LizardFS
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

    Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can also be used to build space-efficient storage, because it is designed to run on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is just as easy as adding a new one.

    Sample Customers
    Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
    Orange Polska, Platige Image, United State Department of Agriculture, Virtu Financial
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization34%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider25%
    University12%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    File and Object Storage
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 10th in File and Object Storage with 7 reviews while LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS). IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 8.0, while LizardFS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "Offers the ease with which you can move data between on-premises storage and the cloud and then retrieve it back on-premises when necessary". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS, IBM Spectrum Scale and NetApp StorageGRID, whereas LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.