We performed a comparison between LizardFS and Red Hat Gluster Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).Earn 20 points
LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 12th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 3 reviews. LizardFS is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "A scalable and easy-to-implement solution that has an excellent technical support team". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, LINBIT SDS and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct.
See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.