HP Wolf Security vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

HP and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while SonicWall is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0. HP holds a 6.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

9,754 Views
5,334 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 10 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,582 Views
774 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and SonicWall Capture Client are two leading security solutions. While HP Wolf Security receives higher marks for pricing and customer support, SonicWall Capture Client's advanced features justify its higher price.

Features: HP Wolf Security reviews highlight its robust protection against malware, strong isolation capabilities, and excellent pricing. SonicWall Capture Client is praised for its advanced threat detection, seamless integration with various security tools, and comprehensive suite of features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest HP Wolf Security could improve by enhancing reporting tools, reducing resource consumption, and expanding integration capabilities. SonicWall Capture Client users seek better user training resources, more frequent updates, and improved customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security users report an easy deployment process and commendable customer service. SonicWall Capture Client also has a straightforward deployment with mixed reviews about customer service effectiveness. HP Wolf Security's superior customer service gives it an advantage here.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is considered more cost-effective with a favorable ROI due to its lower setup costs. SonicWall Capture Client, while more expensive, is deemed worth the investment by users for its extensive features. HP Wolf Security provides better immediate ROI, but SonicWall's ROI improves over time with ongoing protection and advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

29th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

39th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Jasmit Singh Juneja

CEO & Technology Specialist at Karman Infotech Private Limited

A stable solution that is used for endpoint security and to protect computers from malware

We are using the latest version of SonicWall Capture Client. Fortinet is ahead of SonicWall. The range of appliances, equipment, availability in my country with the distributors, and the overall ecosystem of Fortinet is way better than SonicWall. My advice to others looking into using SonicWall Capture Client is to keep giving feedback to the companies regarding whatever improvements should be made. Overall, I rate SonicWall Capture Client an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."

"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"The implementation is not easy."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"They should improve their user interface."

"XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product is very expensive."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 16% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

June 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Valspar

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

May 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.