Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Qumulo comparison

Hitachi Vantara and Qumulo are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Qumulo is ranked #11. Hitachi Vantara holds a 6.3% mindshare in N, compared to Qumulo’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.

Hitachi Virtual Storage Pla...

Read 54 Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform reviews

4,838 Views
1,693 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qumulo

Read 8 Qumulo reviews

3,095 Views
1,486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi Virtual Storage Pla...

Qumulo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform and Qumulo are competing in the data storage industry. Qumulo often holds an advantage due to its advanced features and modern deployment methods.

Features: Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers comprehensive data management with automated tiering and high scalability. It supports various replication types and provides a robust storage system with high availability. Qumulo provides a cloud-native file system with real-time analytics, rapid scalability, and a strong integration with AWS and Google Cloud for enhanced data-driven capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi could enhance its ease of deployment and improve latency and IOPS performance. Modernizing the user interface and incorporating advanced analytical capabilities would also be beneficial. Qumulo might focus on reducing entry cost and ensuring more seamless failover processes. Enhancing the file system analytics and expanding their backup platform integrations could further refine their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi's traditional deployment can be cumbersome yet is supported by reliable customer service that assists during transitions. Qumulo's modern approach allows for quick setup with minimal downtime and proactive support, providing a competitive edge in efficiency and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi follows a traditional pricing model, offering a reliable ROI for large infrastructures. Qumulo’s scalable pricing offers flexibility, with the efficiency of its cloud-native features often leading to a faster ROI, despite a potentially higher initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Virtual Storage Pla...

Ranking in NAS

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), Frame-Based Disk Arrays (1st), All-Flash Storage (9th), NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (5th)

Qumulo

Ranking in NAS

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is 6.3%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 6.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Bratislav Petkovic

Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia

Active data management enhances performance and simplifies operation

The active data management of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, especially with the HOPS Center, makes it easier to work with the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform infrastructure. Previously, it was difficult to create and delete LUNs, which would take a long time, but now with HOPS Center, it is functioning correctly. It is now as easy as working with EMC or Dell storage, and the performance is better, especially with new features. The solution's performance, security, and cost are satisfactory. These factors influenced our decision to purchase Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.

Read full review

VinceVitro

Senior Storage Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support

One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series are Shadowimage, easy to manage equipment, and upgrading the firewire is very simple."

"The setup is very easy to manage and configure. The initial setup and takes one hour more or less."

"This is a good product with high capabilities and high reliability."

"There are no significant challenges in terms of scalability, and it can accommodate larger storage capacities compared to other storage solutions."

"The product provides a good storage space."

"It is the most stable high-end solution in this area."

"The first thing that attracted this model to us was the non-disruptive migration. We had a very large database application that was on older gear and needed to be migrated to these arrays. We had experience with virtualizing behind an array and moving applications and data but this made it even better."

"The performance was decent."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform pros

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Qumulo is the ability to share files and reliability."

"It is a very stable product. I never faced any issues."

"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are the ease of management and special permissions that are quick to enable. The overall performance of the solution is good."

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

Cons

"They should look at the cost because there are other vendors who offer the same cost with more features."

"The deployment could be a bit easier, because it's a bit tricky"

"The user experience is pretty bad in Hitachi. A lot of mandatory tasks take a long time to work through."

"The life-cycle of the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G Series is too short. We only had approximately four or five years out of the solution before it was rendered its end of life."

"We have not been able to procure more discs for upcoming projects and this has been a problem for us. Not having additional storage is going to be an issue. The solution is at its end of life and will be replaced soon."

"The Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform faces challenges when it comes to features like deduplication and compression. Enabling these features can lead to processor overload, resulting in performance degradation, especially under high loads."

"There is a drawback related to Hitachi's configuration flexibility. The Hitachi storage platform solution is not flexible. That means that both the Hitachi and the partner presale guys have to do a lot of work to design a solution."

"Not just anyone can do the deployment. So, the person needs a basic understanding and work experience."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform cons

"Some anti-theft permissions do not transfer well to Qumulo."

"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

"One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Hitachi VSP's pricing is good compared to other brands."

"When you are looking for high-end solutions such as this, price is less important than stability and availability."

"It is expensive as compared to other vendors, but its price is good if you are looking for stability, reliability, performance, and security."

"Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is a very expensive product."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others, such as Dell EMC."

"It is cheap. It is not very expensive. If you decide to expand the system, the cost is pretty low as compared to other vendors, such as Dell."

"Pricing could be better, because the cost is very high."

"The pricing we get is very competitive when compared to other vendors. Hitachi is working on their licensing model and it is improving but can be irksome when many different items are not bundled or enterprise size."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform pricing and cost advice

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform?

The cost of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is reasonable compared to competitors, but it is dependent on the customer; I cannot say for the entire industry, but for us, it's comparable.

See all answers

What do you like most about Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E990?

The product's reliability has been crucial for our company's operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E990?

The replication technology that Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform uses is quite older, and the replication methodology they employ for data between the data center and the production and standby dat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 13% of the time

NetApp AFF vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 12% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo

Compared 23% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 13% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 10% of the time

Scality RING vs Qumulo

Compared 8% of the time

Nasuni vs Qumulo

Compared 8% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

August 2025

Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

August 2025

Download Qumulo product report

Also Known As

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series, 5000 Series, E Series, N Series, G Series

No data available

Overview

RETHINK YOUR DEFINITION OF SPEED AND PERFORMANCE

With adaptive, guaranteed data reduction and a 100% data-availability guarantee, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F series helps you tackle complicated business challenges. Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) VSP F series delivers up to 4.8M IOPS with sub-millisecond response times.
Featuring legendary Hitachi reliability, VSP F series arrays are backed by the industries only 100% availability guarantee. For these reasons, 80% of the Fortune 500 choose Hitachi all-flash arrays to accelerate the performance of mission-critical applications like Oracle, SAP, Virtualization, Microsoft apps etc. With over 350 patents in flash technology, Hitachi’s innovative mix of flash hardware and software accelerates ROI with enterprise-class reliability and performance.

Hitachi Vantara

Qumulo is a data storage and management platform that promotes object-based storage for users, backup archives, and surveillance. Its primary use case is to provide a cost-effective and feature-rich solution for managing large data.

Qumulo's data protection algorithm ensures the safety of node data, while its integration with backup platforms like Veeam and Veritas makes it easy to manage backups. The platform offers a good balance between operational cost and complexity versus feature set, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes.

Qumulo

Sample Customers

Turkcell, Owens Corning, Region Nord, Net Credit Financial Group (NFC Group), Russian Railways

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo

July 2025

Free Report: Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.