We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Hitachi Content Platform vs IBM Cloud Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are using Content Platform for data migration, and it integrates with our HNS platform. This is good because we can integrate it with our existing HNS and SAP solutions. The GUI is also user-friendly. It doesn't take much time to do anything. If we know the architecture and the steps, we can do what we need with a few clicks.""Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data.""One of the most hidden valuable features is ensuring that you don't have bit rot, so it will go and check every single object that's stored on the system, then ensure that if there's a problem, it'll be repaired from either a local copy or remote copy, depending upon your configuration.""The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users.""As an architect, I like the management features that come with Hitachi Content Platform because it makes things easy.""Companies can scale the solution.""The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users."

More Hitachi Content Platform Pros →

"IBM Cloud Object Storage integrates well.""IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage."

More IBM Cloud Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"They should improve the user interface. It's a little bit complex. It does not have a self-learning method. You need to know how to use it before you touch the system. The user interface is not self-explanatory.""Two things that can be improved are pricing and configuration. Mostly the pricing is an issue. And if I were to add anything, I would say more integration with backup solutions such as Veeam Backup.""When you want to replace a disk, we need to start the maintenance from the S nodes. We have to automate maintenance so any onsite engineer can replace it after that, but we don't need to do this on VSP platforms. An engineer can come in and replace that specific disk. If also we could do that on Hitachi Content Platform, it would be great for us.""This product's ability to track logs for access still needs to be improved.""In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country.""What is lacking in this solution is a simple process to migrate from existing systems.""The solution could use more integration with clouds."

More Hitachi Content Platform Cons →

"IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be.""The performance could improve in IBM Cloud Object Storage. The throughput or objects per second can have degradation."

More IBM Cloud Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."
  • "The pricing could be better."
  • More Hitachi Content Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We are using Content Platform for data migration, and it integrates with our HNS platform. This is good because we can integrate it with our existing HNS and SAP solutions. The GUI is also… more »
    Top Answer: 
    When you want to replace a disk, we need to start the maintenance from the S nodes. We have to automate maintenance so any onsite engineer can replace it after that, but we don't need to do this on… more »
    Top Answer: 
    My job involves managing storage, like adding new hosts in our environment, creating users, zoning, and allocation. I completely decommission storage when a site is decommissioned and carry out all… more »
    Top Answer: 
    IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage.
    Top Answer: 
    IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be.
    Top Answer: 
    Perhaps in price and they don't have a large number of additional services.
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    1,598
    Comparisons
    1,018
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    576
    Rating
    9.0
    18th
    Views
    2,017
    Comparisons
    1,642
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    385
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
    Cleversafe
    Learn More
    Overview

    Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

    IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

    Offer
    Learn more about Hitachi Content Platform
    Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Sample Customers
    Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
    Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise43%
    Large Enterprise29%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi Content Platform is ranked 7th in File and Object Storage with 7 reviews while IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 18th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. Hitachi Content Platform is rated 8.6, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Content Platform writes "Has valuable retention logs and the DNS is managed by itself ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "The main advantage is the additional services". Hitachi Content Platform is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID, Pure Storage FlashBlade and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp StorageGRID and StarWind Virtual Tape Library. See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage report.

    See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.