Dell ObjectScale vs Hitachi Content Platform comparison

Dell Technologies and Hitachi Vantara are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Dell Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hitachi Vantara is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Dell Technologies holds a 7.7% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Hitachi Vantara’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Hitachi Vantara users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 26, 2025

Dell ObjectScale and Hitachi Content Platform are competitive storage solutions within the enterprise data management sector. Dell ObjectScale appears to have the upper hand due to its robust integration with Dell EMC products and enterprise features, although Hitachi Content Platform offers excellent encryption and compliance capabilities.

Features: Dell ObjectScale offers valuable features like S3 protocol implementation, power efficiency, and geo-replication support. It excels in integration with other Dell EMC products and provides strong enterprise features like immutability and multi-tenancy support. Hitachi Content Platform focuses on encryption, bit rot prevention, and data deduplication. It provides comprehensive archiving and compliance, integrating well with existing systems and offering versioning and ransomware protection.

Room for Improvement: Dell ObjectScale could improve third-party integration, scaling, and cost-effectiveness. Enhancing disaster recovery and streamlining technical support would also be beneficial. Hitachi Content Platform needs to improve partner integration and user interface. Easier software upgrades and better cloud integration are suggested for enhanced customer experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell ObjectScale is primarily deployed on-premises, offering consistent technical support, although cross-functional knowledge gaps may cause delays. Hitachi Content Platform supports multiple environments, including on-premises and hybrid clouds, with generally effective customer service despite some regional and pricing issues.

Pricing and ROI: Dell ObjectScale has mixed reviews regarding pricing, seen as expensive mainly due to hardware bundling, yet offers long-term scalability and data compression benefits. Hitachi Content Platform is perceived as costly but competitive in certain regions, providing strong ROI through its stability and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.8%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell ObjectScale is 7.7%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hitachi Content Platform is 1.7%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Eric Black

Solutions Architect at Recovery Point Systems

The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us

The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself.

Read full review

SamuelThomas

Consultant at Key Information Technology L.L.C.

Managing efficiently with user-friendly interfaces for monitoring and managing resources

We normally recommend Dell ECS to enterprise customers and government customers Dell ECS is very easy to handle, primarily because the web UI dashboard and everything is very easy to manage for every customer. They can monitor the DPS, access failures, bandwidth, failed requests, and latency.…

Read full review

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement

While deployment is simple, it's not as simple as StorageGRID. The architecture is entirely different, even though the end product uses the same protocols. The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. Deployment isn't as centralized either. Although I've deployed Hitachi Content myself in our production head office for the VM team, even though it's simple, it wasn't completely straightforward. They still required my help with the initial configuration environment setup. So, it's not just simple; there are some tricky aspects. The environment is tricky, but if you understand it, configuration can be done quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FlashBlade offers low latency, high throughput, and seamless scalability."

"We have seen a reduction in the total cost of ownership by around 20%."

"Speed and ease of use are the two most valuable features."

"It is very easy to use, and it is very fast."

"The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on."

"It's very easy-to-use."

"The solution provides many controllers."

"The product is scalable and easy to expand."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pros

"I like that the solution is easy to scale and that's its stable."

"The most valuable feature for me is off-site storage."

"This product is very competitive."

"The performance and support from Dell EMC are very good."

"It is 100% stable. It is also scalable."

"Dell's technical support team is good."

"The stability is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"Dell ECS is a cost-effective solution that provides ease of use and availability."

More Dell ObjectScale pros

"The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users."

"Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging."

"Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data."

"We are using Content Platform for data migration, and it integrates with our HNS platform. This is good because we can integrate it with our existing HNS and SAP solutions. The GUI is also user-friendly. It doesn't take much time to do anything. If we know the architecture and the steps, we can do what we need with a few clicks."

"The platform helps in efficient data management with the ease of server provisioning."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the versioning and the ransomware protection."

"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users."

"Companies can scale the solution."

Cons

"There is some room for new features related to authentication and integration with Kubernetes, and other solution using S3 Bucket."

"On our dedupe during our initial buy, we were expecting a number a little higher like 4x. However, we are getting about 3.6. While it is close enough, it doesn't quite hit the numbers. So, this has been a challenge."

"An area for improvement in Pure Storage FlashBlade is its price. It could be reduced. The technical support for Pure Storage FlashBlade also needs improvement. It used to be good, with more experienced engineers. Nowadays, it isn't, and it takes longer for support to solve problems."

"The Pure Storage Orchestrator is our biggest pain point at the moment. If we can have more say in future developments of feature sets that we will need to support for our use case, that would be pretty beneficial to us."

"I have not seen ROI."

"The solution is expensive."

"There could be improvements in public cloud integration."

"The features provided for SMB customers are limited."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade cons

"While there can be occasional issues with routing to the wrong region that lead to slight delays, it's typically business as usual."

"However, hardware failures can impact the cluster, making it read-only."

"The solution could be more cost-effective and secure."

"There is room for improvement in the DPI reports, as they could be made more user-friendly."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"The major weakness in the solution is that there is no cloud version for Dell ECS."

"They could provide centralized reports."

"Dell EMC ECS should support segregation of duty, particularly for role-based access controls. Having a single pane of glass for smarter observation and better control mechanism would also make this solution better."

More Dell ObjectScale cons

"Hitachi Content Platform is a complicated solution. You need to put several pieces of the hardware together in order to achieve the capacity or the performance needed."

"They could improve compatibility and offer a more user-friendly GUI."

"There is room for improvement in the capacity for integration with other platforms."

"They should improve the user interface. It's a little bit complex. It does not have a self-learning method. You need to know how to use it before you touch the system. The user interface is not self-explanatory."

"This product's ability to track logs for access still needs to be improved."

"At present, it is complicated to use the CLI command."

"The solution could use more integration with clouds."

"What is lacking in this solution is a simple process to migrate from existing systems."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our customers have seen a reduction in TCO."

"I rate the tool's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."

"I have seen ROI. It has allowed me to increase the density of my VMs without having to purchase anything additional."

"We used a reseller for the purchase."

"The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate."

"In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little."

"The product is very expensive."

"The price of this solution could be made more affordable."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pricing and cost advice

"The price of Dell ECS should be reduced."

"Dell ECS is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution's cost is quite reasonable."

"The charges for this solution are made in blocks of models, which are purchased depending on what features an organization requires."

"It is an inexpensive product."

"Dell EMC ECS is too expensive."

"It is an expensive solution. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."

"The product is quite expensive."

More Dell ObjectScale pricing and cost advice

"I think the ROI for this solution is very good because the pricing for it is in between other solutions."

"The product’s cost is average."

"The price of the Hitachi Content Platform is very high."

"The pricing could be better."

"Overall, it's costly."

"Hitachi is more expensive than StorageGRID."

"Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

13%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?

I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Dell EMC ECS?

The tool is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC ECS?

The pricing is moderate and at par with the market. As a service provider, we receive good margins, indicating a favo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell EMC ECS?

It's difficult for me to comment on improvements for Dell ECS because we typically do not engage in those areas. We h...

See all answers

What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?

Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?

In comparison to competitors like Huawei, which can use all storage protocols in the same platform, Hitachi Content P...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?

Mainly, from my project, Hitachi Content Platform is used for archiving. The customer is in banking, so they need to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 19% of the time

MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 10% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 10% of the time

Qumulo vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 3% of the time

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Dell ObjectScale

Compared 16% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Dell ObjectScale

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Dell ObjectScale

Compared 14% of the time

MinIO vs Dell ObjectScale

Compared 10% of the time

VAST Data vs Dell ObjectScale

Compared 3% of the time

More Dell ObjectScale Competitors

MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 25% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Hitachi Content Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure Storage FlashBlade

August 2025

Download Pure Storage FlashBlade product report

Buyer's Guide

Dell ObjectScale

August 2025

Download Dell ObjectScale product report

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Content Platform

August 2025

Download Hitachi Content Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

EMC ECS, Dell EMC Elastic Cloud Storage (ECS)

HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP

Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Pure Storage

Dell ObjectScale is a next-generation S3 object storage platform known for scalability, performance, and efficiency. It integrates with Dell EMC products, combining hardware and software for seamless user experience in the AI era.

Dell ObjectScale implements the S3 protocol, integrating smoothly with Dell EMC solutions like ISILON. Its architecture supports data compression and interoperates with multiple protocols for enhanced performance. Enterprise features include immutability, geo-replication, and user-friendly management. However, it needs better integration with other systems, enhanced security, and disaster recovery. Write performance and scalability improvements, competitive pricing, and documentation enhancements are key areas for progress. The interface could be more straightforward, with more remote management features and native analytics.

What features does Dell ObjectScale offer?

S3 Protocol Implementation: Brings industry-standard access with wide application compatibility
Seamless Dell EMC Integration: Ensures stability and ease of use with existing systems
Data Compression and Protocol Interoperability: Enhances performance and storage efficiency
Immutability and Geo-Replication: Provides enterprise-level data protection
Optimized Pricing: Balances cost with comprehensive support

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Supports expanding data requirements effectively
Integration Flexibility: Works with many existing systems for better interoperability
Ease of Management: Streamlines hardware and software operations
Enterprise-Level Features: Delivers advanced protection and efficiency

Industries leverage Dell ObjectScale for cloud-based object storage, archiving, and backups. It's favored for unstructured data management, CCTV integration, and document archiving. Strong in data analytics, it integrates well with high-capacity applications, enhancing data retention strategies across fields.

Dell Technologies

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

Hitachi Vantara

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL

Atos

Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master

Buyer's Guide

Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell ObjectScale vs. Hitachi Content Platform report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.