HCL AppScan and Parasoft SOAtest compete in the software testing category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and advanced automation, despite HCL AppScan's favorable pricing and quick ROI.
Features:HCL AppScan is noted for its strong security testing capabilities, seamless integration with DevOps tools, and efficient vulnerability scanning. Parasoft SOAtest offers exceptional functional testing, end-to-end automation solutions, and detailed reporting features that enhance its usability in complex testing environments.
Room for Improvement:HCL AppScan needs better integration with third-party tools, more frequent updates, and an improved user interface. Parasoft SOAtest requires enhanced documentation, a simpler learning curve for new users, and a reduction in its initial setup complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Both tools provide flexible deployment options. HCL AppScan allows faster deployment and receives positive feedback for its responsive customer service. Parasoft SOAtest requires more initial setup time, but it compensates with good support despite its steeper learning curve.
Pricing and ROI:HCL AppScan is more cost-effective, offering quicker ROI with lower setup costs and smooth implementation. Parasoft SOAtest involves higher initial costs, but its expansive feature set justifies the investment by delivering high ROI through improved testing accuracy and reduced time to market.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Veracode provides excellent assistance and regularly scheduled calls to address customer concerns and updates.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher end cost-wise.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
